Keywords
CO2 reduction
Circular economy
Renewable energy
Sustainable pathways
Reduce reuse recycle waste hierarchy
How to Cite
Abstract
The urgent need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by gradually abandoning fossil fuel sources is required due to climate-changing emergencies. Employing as much as possible renewable energy, in any form and any field, together with a reduction of per capita energy need, can reduce this tendency and contrast the catastrophic consequence of our planet temperature increasing. In this scenario, biofuels production, together with reuse and recycling represent a correct strategy to contrast environmental degradation. Biofuel has been the subject of great interest over the past decade. Their development from the first to the fourth generation has led to significant improvements in the production cycles and extended the interest in new resources. The availability of different choices could permit to use always the best solution to maximize the result.
In this paper, the different biofuel generations are presented with the aim of highlighting strengths and weaknesses to identify a smart approach to energy conversion and land utilization. Even today the first-generation biofuels are the most widespread, while second-generation gives a small contribution, with a low replacement share of fossil fuels. Land use and competition with other human necessities are the most relevant constraints in this evaluation. In general, the production of gaseous fuels requires less energy than liquid for both the first as well as second-generation technologies. When considering gaseous options, biomethane should be preferred for convenient energy balance in the productive process and when biogas cannot be directly employed. Moreover, biomethane gives the possibility to be added to the existing gas network. The new third and fourth-generation technologies could allow a considerable efficiency increase while reducing the problem of the biofuel productive chain.
References
Directive 2003/30/Ec of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Presidency Conclusions of the Brussels European Council (8/9 March 2007).
Eurostat. Renewable energy statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Renewable_energy_statistics. (accessed April 28, 2021)
European Commission. A European Green Deal. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal. (accessed September 14, 2021).
Foreign Agricultural Service. EU-28: Biofuels Annual. https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/eu-28-biofuels-annual-1. (accessed September 16, 2021).
Chiaramonti D, Talluri G, Scarlat N, Prussi M. The challenge of forecasting the role of biofuel in EU transport decarbonisation at 2050: A meta-analysis review of published scenarios. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021; 139: 110715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110715.
IPCC, 2021: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. In Press. (2021).
Evans RL. Fuelling our future. Cambridge University Press (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807015.
Bridgwater AV. The technical and economic feasibility of biomass gasification for power generation. Fuel 1995; 74(5): pp 631-653. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361.
Dornburg V, Faaij APC, Meuleman B. Optimising waste treatment system Part A: Methodology and technological data for optimising energy production and economic performance. Resource, Conservation and Recycling 2006; 49: pp 68-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.03.004.
Dornburg V, Faaij APC. Optimising waste treatment system Part B: Analyses and scenarios for The Netherlands. Resource, Conservation and Recycling 2006; 48: pp 277-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.02.002.
Ptasinski KJ, Prins MJ, Pierik A. Exergetic evaluation of biomass gasification. Elsevier 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.06.024.
Rajvanshi AK. Biomass Gasification. Alternative Energy in Agriculture, Vol. II, Ed. D. Yogi Goswami, CRC Press, Chapter (No. 4), 1986; pgs. 83-102.
Rutz D, Jassen R. Biofuel technology handbook. WIP Renewable Energies 2007.
Paul N, Kemnitz D. Biofuels, FNR 2006.
Spath P, Aden A, Eggeman T, Ringer M, Wallace B, Jechura J. Biomass to Hydrogen Production Detailed Design and Economics Utilizing the Battelle Columbus Laboratory Indirectly-Heated Gasifier. Technical Report Biomass to Hydrogen NREL/TP-51037408 Production 2005.
van der Drift A, van der Meijden CM, Boerrigter H. Milena gasification technology for high efficient SNG production from biomass. ECN Biomass 2005, 14 th European Biomass Conference & Exhibition, Paris France, 17-21 October 2005.
Tampier M, Beauchemin PA, Smith D, Bibeau E. Identifying environmentally preferable uses for biomass resources. British Columbia Ministry of Forests and Range, Ministry of Energy, Mines & Petroleum 2006.
Boerrigter H, Zwart RWR. High efficiency co-production of Fischer-Tropsch transportation fuel and substitute Natural Gas from biomass. ECN Biomass 2004. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef049837w.
Alabi AO, Tampier M, Bibeau E. Microalgae technologies and processes for bioenergy production in British Columbia: current technology, suitability & barriers to implementation. Final Report submitted to the British Columbia Innovation Council. 2009; 1-88.
Sun H, Zhao W, Mao X. et al. High-value biomass from microalgae production platforms: strategies and progress based on carbon metabolism and energy conversion. Biotechnol Biofuels 2018; 11: 227. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1225-6.
Rocca S, Agostini A, Giuntoli J, Marell L. Biofuels from algae: technology options, energy balance and GHG emissions; Insights from a literature review, EUR 27582 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2790/125847.
Acién FG, Fernández JM, Magán JJ, Molina E. Production cost of a real microalgae production plant and strategies to reduce it. Biotechnology Advances 2012; 30(6): 1344-1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.02.005.
Brentner LB, Eckelman MJ, Zimmerman JB. Combinatorial Life Cycle Assessment to Inform Process Design of Industrial Production of Algal Biodiesel. Environmental Science & Technology 2011; 45(16): 7060-7067. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2006995.
Shokravi Z, Shokravi H, Aziz MA, Shokravi H. The Fourth-Generation Biofuel: A Systematic Review on Nearly Two Decades of Research from 2008 to 2019, in Fossil Free Fuels - Trends in Renewable Energy, Boca Raton, CRC Press 2019. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429327773.
Melis A. Solar energy conversion efficiencies in photosynthesis: Minimizing the chlorophyll antennae to maximize efficiency. Plant Science 2009; 177(4): 272-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.06.005.
Abdullah B, Muhammad SAFS, Shokravi Z, et al. Fourth generation biofuel: A review on risks and mitigation strategies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2019; 107: 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.018.
Brynolf S, Taljegard M, Grahn M, Hansson J. Electrofuels for the transport sector: A review of production costs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2018; 81(2): 1887-1905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.288.
Aro EM. From first generation biofuels to advanced solar biofuels. Ambio 2016; 45: 24-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0730-0.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Luigi De Simio, Sabato Iannaccone