Field Evaluation of a Novel, Granular Soil Fumigant for Controlling Phytophthora ramorum in Field Nursery Soils

Authors

  • Marissa L. Layman Independent Research Associate
  • Craig Ramsey Retired USDA-APHIS Fort Collins, Colorado 80526, USA
  • Wolfgang Schweigkofler University of California, San Rafael, California, 94901, USA
  • Steven E. Newman Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9813.2020.07.2

Keywords:

Phytopthora ramorum, Soil Fumigation, Chlorine Dioxide Granules, Nurseries.

Abstract

 Phytophthora ramorum, the causal agent of Sudden Oak Death (SOD) and ramorum blight, infects a wide range of hardwood and nursery ornamental species. Chlamydospores of P. ramorum can survive for extended periods of time in soils. Two studies were conducted, including: 1) a laboratory study to evaluate two liquid disinfectants for controlling P. ramorum chlamydospores, and 2) a field study to evaluate a novel soil fumigation treatment as an alternative to soil steaming or methyl bromide soil fumigation. The liquid disinfectants were ElectroBiocide and Oxidate 2.0. The laboratory study resulted in complete inactivation of the P. ramorum chlamydospores after six minutes of contact time for both the liquid disinfectants The field study evaluated a chlorine dioxide granule formulation that was applied at two rates in a nursery soil. Rhododendron leaf discs were inoculated with P. ramorum, placed in permeable sachets and buried at two soil depths in a research nursery. Soil treatments also included saturated hydrogels (with and without gels) so that soil moisture effects on chlamydospore survival could be estimated. The sachets were recovered 5, 15 and 30 days after the soil treatment. Efficacy of the soil treatments was evaluated by the number of leaf discs showing P. ramorum growth recovered from the sachets. The soil fumigation treatment with highest efficacy occurred when the sachets were buried at the 5 cm soil depth, were treated with hydrogels, at the highest Z-series granule rate (800g/tube), and had a contact time of 30 days. The probability of P. ramorum growth for this soil treatment was 0.18, or 18%, i.e. the probability of that fumigation treatment inactivating the pathogen was 82%. Also, as the soil moisture increased, the efficacy of the fumigation treatments also increased.

Author Biographies

Wolfgang Schweigkofler, University of California, San Rafael, California, 94901, USA

National Ornamentals Research Site at Dominican

Steven E. Newman, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA

Horticulture and Landscape Architecture

References

Rizzo DM, Garbelotto M, Davidson JM, Slaughter GW, Koike, ST. Phytophthora ramorum as the cause of extensive mortality of Quercus spp. and Lithocarpus densiflorus in California. Plant Dis 2002a; 86(3): 205-215. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.3.205

Rizzo DM, Garbelotto M, Davidson JM, Slaughter GW, Koike ST. Phytophthora ramorum and Sudden Oak Death in California: Host Relationships. In: Standiford R, McCreary D. 5th Symposium on California Oak Woodlands. USDA Forest Service. Gen Tech 2002b; PSW-GTR-184: 733-740.

Garbelotto M, Davison JM, Ivors K, Maloney PE, Hüberli D, Koike ST, Rizzo DM. Non-oak native plants are main hosts for sudden oak death pathogen in California. California Agriculture 2003; 57(1): 18-23. https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.v057n01p18

California Oak Mortality Task Force (COMTF). September Report. http://www.suddenoakdeath.org/library/ California Oak Mortality Task Force 2017a; p. 5.

Kliejunas JT. Sudden oak death and Phytophthora ramorum: a summary of literature. Gen Tech Report- Pacific Southwest Research Station. USDA Forest Service 2010; No. PSWGTR-234. https://doi.org/10.2737/PSW-GTR-234

Grünwald NJ, Garbelotto M, Huengens K, Prospero S. Emergence of the sudden oak death pathogen Phytophthora ramorum. Trends Microbiol 2012; 20(3): 131-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2011.12.006

Widmer T. Survival of Phytophthora kernoviae oospores, sporangia, and mycelium. New Zealand J Forestry Sci 2011.

Babadoost M, Pavon C. Survival of Oospores of Phytophthora capsici in Soil. Am Pythopatho Soc 2013; 97(11): 1478-1483. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-12-12-1123-RE

Grünwald NJ, Parke J, Peterson E. Development and application of an epidemiological framework for management of Phytophthora ramorum on rhododendron in nursery settings. In Dominican University, National Ornamental Research Site (NORS-DUC) FY14-15 Annual Report 2015; pp. 54-59.

Bernarde MA, Israel BM, Olivieri VP, Granstrom ML. Efficiency of chlorine dioxide as a bactericide. Appl Microbiol 1965; 13(5): 776-780. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.13.5.776-780.1965

Chatuev BM, Peterson JW. Analysis of the sporicidal activity of chlorine dioxide disinfectant against Bacillus anthracis (Sterne strain). J Hosp Infect 2010; 74(2): 178-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2009.09.017

Bang J, Hong A, Kim H, Beuchat LR, Rhee MS, Kim Y, Ryu JH. Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157: H7 in biofilm on food-contact surfaces by sequential treatments of aqueous chlorine dioxide and drying. Int J Food Microbiol 2014; 191: 129-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.09.014

Erwin CD, Ribeiro OK. Phytophthora Diseases Worldwide. St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society Press 1996; p. 562.

Jeffers SN, Martin SB. Comparison of Two Media Selective for Phytophthora and Pythium Species. Plant Disease 1986; 70: 1038-1043. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-70-1038

Ferguson AJ, Jeffers SN. Detecting multiple species of Phytophthora in container mixes from ornamental crop nurseries. Plant Disease 1999; 83: 1129-1136. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1999.83.12.1129

USDA. Phytophthora ramorum Confirmed nursery protocol 2014. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/ planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pests-anddiseases/phytophthora-ramorum/ct_protocols

Schweigkofler W, Kosta K, Huffman V, Sharma S, Suslow K, Ghosh S. Steaming inactivates Phytophthora ramorum, causal agent of Sudden Oak Death and ramorum blight, from infested nursery soils in California. Plant Health Progress 2014; 15: 43-47. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHP-RS-13-0111

Funahashi F, Parke JL. Effects of soil solarization and Trichoderma asperellum on soilborne inoculum of Phytophthora ramorum and Phytophthora pini in container nurseries. Plant Disease 2016; 100: 438-443. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-15-0453-RE

Widmer TL, Johnson-Brousseau S, Kosta K, Ghosh S, Schweigkofler W, Sharma S, Suslow K. Remediation of Phytophthora ramorum-infested soil with Trichoderma asperellum isolate 04-22 under ornamental nursery conditions. Biological Control 2018; 118: 67-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.12.007

Linderman R, Davis E. Eradication of Phytophthora ramorum and other pathogens from potting medium or soil by treatment with aerated steam or fumigation with metam sodium. Hort Technology 2008; 18(1): 106-110. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.18.1.106

Yakabe L, MacDonald J. Soil treatments for the potential elimination of Phytophthora ramorum in ornamental nursery beds. Plant Disease 2010; 94(3): 320-324. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-94-3-0320

Downloads

Published

2020-11-13

How to Cite

1.
Marissa L. Layman, Craig Ramsey, Wolfgang Schweigkofler, Steven E. Newman. Field Evaluation of a Novel, Granular Soil Fumigant for Controlling Phytophthora ramorum in Field Nursery Soils. Glob. J. Agric. Innov. Res. Dev [Internet]. 2020Nov.13 [cited 2021Oct.25];7:12-9. Available from: https://avantipublishers.com/jms/index.php/gjaird/article/view/720

Issue

Section

Articles