Assessment of User Preferences in Electric Vehicle Charge Billing System

Authors

  • Eva Maeda Section of Energy, Department of Electrical Engineering, Dar es Salaam Institute of Technology, Dar es Salaam 11104, Tanzania
  • Georgia Rugumila Department of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering, Dar es Salaam Institute of Technology, Dar es Salaam 11104, Tanzania
  • Kenedy A. Greyson Department of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering, Dar es Salaam Institute of Technology, Dar es Salaam 11104, Tanzania
  • Gerutu B. Gerutu Section of Energy, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dar es Salaam Institute of Technology, Dar es Salaam 11104, Tanzania
  • Esebi A. Nyari Section of Energy, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dar es Salaam Institute of Technology, Dar es Salaam 11104, Tanzania
  • Ramadhani O. Kivugo Section of Energy, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dar es Salaam Institute of Technology, Dar es Salaam 11104, Tanzania
  • Frank Lujaji Section of Energy, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dar es Salaam Institute of Technology, Dar es Salaam 11104, Tanzania
  • Pius V. Chombo Section of Energy, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dar es Salaam Institute of Technology, Dar es Salaam 11104, Tanzania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-5818.2024.11.3

Keywords:

Tanzania, Bill payment, Billing system, Electric vehicles, Charging station

Abstract

Despite the advantages of electric vehicles (EVs), however, their adoption rate in Tanzania remains low. The growth and sustainability of EVs remain questionable due to several factors including an insufficient network of charging infrastructure coupled with billing systems. This study analyzes user preferences related to EV charge billing requirements based on the qualitative assessment of semi-structured interviews with EV users. A survey was conducted around Dar es Salaam city and around 81 sample surveys were administered. The targeted parameters are current EV charge types, daily charging frequency, charging duration, billing system, bill payment, and expectations on public charging infrastructure. The factors were selected to enable an understanding of the drivers for improving acceptance of EV charge billing systems and deduce their market potential. For electric two-wheelers (e2Ws), the findings indicated that 60% of e-bicycle riders charge once per day, 30% charge twice per day, and 10% charge 3 times per day. Moreover, 34% of e-bicycle batteries were charged with 50% of energy remaining in the battery, which took 2 to 3 hours. Contrary, 40.74% of electric three-wheelers (e3Ws) were charging 2 times per day, 33.33% were charging 3 times per day, and 25.93% were charging 1 time per day. In terms of billing, e-bicycles’ charging energy was metered but not billed while e3Ws’ charging energy was not metered but billed at a flat rate regardless of the energy consumed. The majority of EV drivers expected more public charging stations to be equipped with accurate energy measuring systems to enable them to pay-per-use.

References

IEA. Oil demand growing at a slower pace as post-Covid rebound runs its course. https://www.iea.org/commentaries/oil-demand-growing-at-a-slower-pace-as-post-covid-rebound-runs-its-course (Accessed on November 1, 2024).

Enerdata. World Energy & Climate Statistics – Yearbook 2024. https://yearbook.enerdata .net/total-energy/world-consumption-statistics.html (Accessed on November 1, 2024).

Hosseini SH, Tsolakis A, Alagumalai A, Mahian O, Lam SS, Pan J, et al. Use of hydrogen in dual-fuel diesel engines. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2023; 98: 101100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2023.101100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2023.101100

Weber S, Hans W. Environmental awareness: The case of climate change. Russ J Econ. 2018; 4: 328-45. https://doi.org/10.3897/j.ruje.4.33619 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/j.ruje.4.33619

Santos FD, Ferreira PL, Pedersen JST. The climate change challenge: a review of the barriers and solutions to deliver a paris solution. Climate. 2022; 10(5): 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli10050075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cli10050075

Malima GC, Moyo F. Are electric vehicles economically viable in sub-Saharan Africa? The total cost of ownership of internal combustion engine and electric vehicles in Tanzania. Transp Policy. 2023; 141: 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.07.014

Ahmed M, Huan W, Ali N, Shafi A, Ehsan M, Abdelrahman K, et al. The effect of energy consumption, income, and population growth on CO2 emissions: evidence from NARDL and machine learning models. Sustainability, 2023; 15(15): 11956. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511956 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511956

Osobajo OA, Otitoju A, Otitoju MA, Oke A. The impact of energy consumption and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions. Sustainability. 2020; 12: 7965. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197965 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197965

Mastoi MS, Zhuang S, Munir HM, Haris M, Hassan M, Usman M, et al. An in-depth analysis of electric vehicle charging station infrastructure, policy implications, and future trends. Energy Rep. 2022; 8:11504-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.09.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.09.011

International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). (2024) Transport. https://www.irena.org /Energy-Transition/Technology/Transport (Accessed on November 1, 2024).

Aryanpur V, Rogan F. Decarbonising Road freight transport: The role of zero-emission trucks and intangible costs. Sci Rep. 2024; 14: 2113. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52682-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52682-4

Maheshwari J, Cherla S, Garg A. Consumer perspectives on electric vehicle infrastructure in India: Survey Results. In: Pillai RK, Dixit A, Dhapre S, Eds., ISUW 2019. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol. 764. Singapore: Springer; 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1299-2_14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1299-2_14

IEA. Electric Vehicles. https://www.iea.org/energy-system/transport/electric-vehicl es (Accessed on November 1, 2024).

Jochem P, Babrowski S, Fichtner W. Assessing CO2 emissions of electric vehicles in Germany in 2030. Transp Res A. 2015; 78: 68-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015. 05.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.05.007

Hoekstra A. The underestimated potential of battery electric vehicles to reduce emissions. Joule. 2019; 3(6): 1412-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.06.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.06.002

Bastida-Molina P, Hurtado-Pérez E, Peñalvo-López E, Moros-Gómez MC. Assessing transport emissions reduction while increasing electric vehicles and renewable generation levels. Transp Res D Trans Environ. 2020; 88: 102560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102560 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102560

Costa CM, Barbosa JC, Castro H, Gonçalves R, Lanceros-Méndez S. Electric vehicles: To what extent are environmentally friendly and cost effective?–Comparative study by European countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021; 151: 111548. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.rser.2021.111548 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111548

Rajendran G, Vaithilingam CA, Misron N, Naidu K, Ahmed MR. A comprehensive review on system architecture and international standards for electric vehicle charging stations. J Energy Storage. 2021; 42: 103099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.103099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.103099

Jaruwatanachai P, Sukamongkol Y, Samanchuen T. Predicting and managing EV charging demand on electrical grids: A simulation-based approach. Energies. 2023; 16(8): 3562. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083562 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083562

Adhikary S, Biswas PK, Sain C. Comprehensive review on charging solution of electric vehicle-an internet of things-based approach. Int J Electr Hybrid Veh. 2023; 15(1): 40-66. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEHV.2023.129071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEHV.2023.129071

Pamidimukkala A, Kermanshachi S, Rosenberger JM, Hladik G. Barriers to adoption of electric vehicles in Texas. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2024; 31: 16735-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32337-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32337-7

Fischer M, Michalk W, Hardt C, Bogenberger K. Bill it right: evaluating public charging station usage behavior under the presence of different pricing policies. World Elec Veh J. 2024; 5(4): 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj15040175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj15040175

Ramesan S, Kumar P, Garg SK. Analyzing the enablers to overcome the challenges in the adoption of electric vehicles in Delhi NCR. Case Stud Transp Policy. 2022; 10(3): 1640-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.06.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.06.003

Alanazi F. Electric vehicles: benefits, challenges, and potential solutions for widespread adaptation. Appl Sci. 2023; 13(10): 6016. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13106016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13106016

Levinson RS, West TH. Impact of public electric vehicle charging infrastructure. Transp Res D: Transp Environ. 2018; 64: 158-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.10.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.10.006

Afshar S, Macedo P, Mohamed F, Disfani V. Mobile charging stations for electric vehicles—A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021; 152: 111654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser .2021.111654 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111654

UN-HABITAT. Barriers and Opportunities to the Adoption of Electric Vehicle technology in Dar es Salaam. https://unhabitat.org/join-us/calls/barriers-and-opportunities-to-the-adoption-of-electric-vehicle-technology-in-dar-es (Accessed on October 21, 2024).

Goletz M, Ehebrecht D, Wachter C, Tolk D, Lenz B, Kühnel M, et al. Electrification of urban three-wheeler taxis in tanzania: combining the user’s perspective and technical feasibility challenges. Small Electr Veh. 2021; 22: 97. https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-030-65843-4_8

Plenter F, Chasin F, von Hoffen M, Betzing JH, Matzner M, Becker J. Assessment of peer-provider potentials to share private electric vehicle charging stations. Transp Res D: Transp Environ. 2018; 64: 178-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.02.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.02.013

Potoglou D, Song R, Santos G. Public charging choices of electric vehicle users: A review and conceptual framework. Transp Res D: Transp Environ. 2023; 121: 103824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103824 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103824

Burnham A, Dufek EJ, Stephens T, Francfort J, Michelbacher C, Carlson RB, et al. Enabling fast charging–Infrastructure and economic considerations. J Power Sources. 2017; 367: 237-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jpowsour.2017.06.079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.079

Motoaki Y, Shirk MG. Consumer behavioral adaption in EV fast charging through pricing. Energy Policy. 2017; 108: 178-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.051

Visaria AA, Jensen AF, Thorhauge M, Mabit SE. User preferences for EV charging, pricing schemes, and charging infrastructure. Transp Res A Policy Pract. 2022; 165: 120-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.08.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.08.013

Lee JH, Chakraborty D, Hardman SJ, Tal G. Exploring electric vehicle charging patterns: Mixed usage of charging infrastructure. Transp Res D: Transp Environ. 2020; 79: 102249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102249 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102249

Chakraborty D, Bunch DS, Lee JH, Tal G. Demand drivers for charging infrastructure-charging behavior of plug-in electric vehicle commuters. Transp Res D Trans Environ. 2019; 76: 255-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.09.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.09.015

Franke T, Krems JF. Understanding charging behaviour of electric vehicle users. Transp Res F: Traffic Psychol. 2013; 21: 75-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2013.09.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2013.09.002

Macrotrends. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Metro Area Population 1950-2024.https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/cities/22894/dar-es-salaam/population (Accessed on October 21, 2024).

CleanTechnica. Tanzania Now Has More Than 5,000 EVs, The Most in East Africa. https://cleantechnica.com/2023/04/06/tanzania-now-has-more-than-5000-evs-the-most-in-east-africa/ (Accessed on November 1, 2024).

World Bank Group. Overview. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/tanzania/ overview#:~:text=Tanzania's%20regional%20projects%

are%20focused,%2Dmiddle %2Dincome%20country%20status (Accessed on October 21, 2024).

Turuka FM. Tanzania middle income country status and implications for future economic growth strategies. Tanz J Agric Sci. 2022; 21(1): 335-43.

UNEP. Tanzania’s smoke-spewing three-wheelers face new electric competition. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/

tanzanias-smoke-spewing-three-wheelers-face-new-electric-competition (Accessed on October 21, 2024).

Katuga Y, Kivugo R, Chombo P. Reliability Improvement in the Traction System of Tanzania Standard Gauge Railway. Tanz J Eng Technol. 2023; 42(4): 108-17. https://doi.org/10.52339/tjet.v42i4.932 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52339/tjet.v42i4.932

The Citizen. TZ@60: What it will take to benefit from SGR. https://www. thecitizen.co.tz/tanzania/news/national/tz-60-what-it-will-take-to-benefit-from-sgr-3604882 (Accessed on October 21, 2024).

The Guardian. Economist outlines benefits of SGR as TRC introduces express routes. https://www.ippmedia.com/the-guardian/business/read/economist-outlines-benefits-of-sgr-as-trc-introduces-express-routes-2024-07-13-103056 (Accessed on October 21, 2024).

IEA. Energy system of Tanzania. https://www.iea.org/countries/tanzania (Accessed on November 1, 2024).

The World Bank. Changing Lives and Livelihoods in Tanzania, One Electricity Connection at a Time. https://www.worldbank.org/

en/news/feature/2022/06/28/changing-lives-and-livelihoods-in-tanzania-one-electricity-connection-at-a-time#main (Accessed on October 21, 2024).

Statista. (2024). Share of the population with access to electricity in Tanzania from 2013 to 2022. https://www.statista.com/

statistics/1221150/population-with-access-to-electr icity-in-tanzania/#:~:text=In%202022%2C%20the%20share%20of,in%202022%20 with% 2045.8%20percent (Accessed on November 1, 2024).

Gerutu GB, Greyson KA, Chombo PV. Compressed Natural Gas as an Alternative Vehicular Fuel in Tanzania: Implementation, Barriers, and Prospects. methane. 2023; 2(1): 66-85. https://doi.org/10.3390/methane2010006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/methane2010006

Malima GC, Moyo F. Are electric vehicles economically viable in sub-Saharan Africa? The total cost of ownership of internal combustion engine and electric vehicles in Tanzania. Transp Policy. 2023; 141: 14-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.07.014

AfEMA. Technical Brief: East Africa Finance Acts 2023/4. https://africaema.org/resou rces/AfEMA_technical_brief_2023_EAC.pdf (Accessed on November 10, 2024).

Deb S, Tammi K, Kalita K, Mahanta P. Review of recent trends in charging infrastructure planning for electric vehicles. Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Energy Environ. 2018; 7(6): e306. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.306

Downloads

Published

2024-12-20

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Assessment of User Preferences in Electric Vehicle Charge Billing System. Glob. J. Energy. Technol. Res. Updates. [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 20 [cited 2026 Feb. 13];11:66-77. Available from: https://avantipublishers.com/index.php/gjetru/article/view/1555

Similar Articles

41-41 of 41

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)