Abstract
Carbondioxide (CO2) injection is a very effective and proven technology for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) and oil swelling are two important factors of the CO2 gas displacement mechanism that occurs in the reservoir when CO2 injection is applied to enhance oil recovery. In this study, MMP determination between crude oil samples and CO2 gas has been conducted using three methods, i.e., empirical equation, correlations method, and laboratory experiment using slimtube. The determination of the swelling factor was conducted using a PVT cell, where recombined fluid is injected at the reservoir temperature. The MMP value from the empirical equation (2810 psig) is relatively close to the MMP value from the laboratory experiment (2807 psig), with a difference of 3 psig. The swelling test results show that the bubble point pressure and the swelling factor increase from 410 psig to 2200 psig and from 1.0 to 1.442, respectively, as the CO2 gas injection reaches 46.82% mole. Since the fracture pressure of the KMJ Layer in the HKY Field is 2200 psig and the MMP is 2807 psig, only immiscible CO2 flooding can be applied in the field because the CO2 MMP is higher than the fracture pressure.
References
Stalkup FI. Miscible displacement. vol. 8. Texas: Henry L. Doherty Memorial Fund of AIME, Society of Petroleum Engineers; 1983.
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran "UPN". Feasibility study of CO2 flooding, lapangan Jatibarang, Pertamina EP Region Java. Yogyakarta. 2011.
Abdurrahman M, Bae W, Permadi AK, Am S, Gunadi B, Saputra DDSM, et al. Opportunities and challenges of CO2 flooding implementation in Indonesia. SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, SPE; Jakarta, Indonesia: 22-24th October 2013. https://doi.org/10.2118/165847-MS
Chae KS, Lee JW. Risk analysis and simulation for geologic storage of CO2. Proceedings of the World Congress on Advances in Civil, Environmental, and Materials Research, Incheon, Korea: 25-29th August 2015.
Lee JY, Permadi AK, Kim H-T, Huh D-G, Park JM, Lee W, et al. Overview of CO2-EOR operation plan of meruap field. Proceedings of the World Congress on Advances in Civil, Environmental, and Materials Research, Incheon, Korea: 25-29th August 2015.
Abdurrahman M, Permadi AK, Bae WS, Masduki A. EOR in Indonesia: past, present, and future. Int J Oil Gas Coal Technol. 2017; 16: 250-70. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJOGCT.2017.087024
Suarsana IP. Producing high CO2 gas content reservoirs in Pertamina Indonesia using multi stage cryogenic process. SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia: SPE; 18-20th October 2010. https://doi.org/10.2118/134278-MS
Rostami A, Arabloo M, Kamari A, Mohammadi AH. Modeling of CO2 solubility in crude oil during carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery using gene expression programming. Fuel 2017; 210: 768-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.08.110
Abdassah D, Siregar S, Kristanto D. The potential of carbondioxide gas injection application in improving oil recovery. Society of Petroleum Engineers International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China, Beijing, Chin:, SPE; 7-10th November 2000. https://doi.org/10.2118/64730-MS
Miller JS, Jones RA. A laboratory study to determine physical characteristics of heavy oil after CO2 saturation. SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma: SPE; April 1981. https://doi.org/10.2118/9789-MS
Barclay TH, Mishra S. New correlations for CO2-Oil solubility and viscosity reduction for light oils. J Pet Explor Prod Technol. 2016; 6: 815-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-016-0233-y
Welker JR, Dunlop DD. Physical properties of carbonated oils. J Pet Technol. 1963; 15(8): 873-6. https://doi.org/ 10.2118/567-PA
Simon R, Graue DJ. Generalized correlation for predicting solubility swelling and behaviour CO2-Crude oil system. J Pet Technol. 1965; 17(01): 102-6. https://doi.org/10.2118/917-PA
Emera MK, Sarma HK. A genetic algorithm-based model to predict CO2-oil physical properties for dead-live oil. Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta: Petroleum Society of Canada; 13-15th June 2006. https://doi.org/10.2118/2006-197
Leach MP, Yellig WF. Compositional model studies CO2 oil displacement mechanisms. Soc Pet Eng J. 1981; 21: 89-97. https://doi.org/10.2118/8368-PA
Yellig WF. Carbon dioxide displacement of West Texas reservoir oil. Soc Pet Eng J. 1982; 22: 805-15. https://doi.org/10.2118/9785-PA
Holm LW, Josendal VA. Mechanisms of oil displacement by carbondioxide. J Pet Technol. 1974; 26: 419-27. https://doi.org/10.2118/4736-PA
Yellig WF, Metcalfe RS. Determination and Prediction of CO2 Minimum Miscibility Pressures (includes associated paper 8876). J Pet Technol. 1980; 32: 160-8. https://doi.org/10.2118/7477-PA
Mungan N. Carbon dioxide displacement fundamentals. J Can Pet Technol. 1981; 20: 87-92. https://doi.org/10.2118/81-01-03
Sohrabi M, Emadi A. Novel insights into the pore-scale mechanisms of enhanced oil recovery by CO2 injection. SPE Europec/EAGE Annual Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark: SPE; 4-7th June 2012. https://doi.org/10.2118/154529-MS
Stalkup FI. Carbon dioxide miscible flooding: past, present, and outlook for the future. J Pet Technol. 1978; 30: 1102-12. https://doi.org/10.2118/7042-PA
Stalkup FI. Displacement behavior of the condensing/vaporizing gas drive process. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, USA: SPE; 27-30th of September 1987. https://doi.org/10.2118/16715-MS
Klins MA. Carbondioxide flooding: Basic mechanisms and project design. Boston: Springer; 1984.
Taber JJ, Martin FD, Seright RS. EOR screening criteria revisited-Part 1: Introduction to screening criteria and enhanced oil recovery field projects. SPE Res Eng. 1997; 12: 189-98. https://doi.org/10.2118/35385-PA
Alomair O, Malallah A, Elsharkawy A, Iqbal M. Prédiction de la pression miscibilité minimum (MMP) du CO2 en utilisant un algorithme basé sur l’ACE (Alternating Conditional Expectation). Oil Gas Sci Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies Nouvelles. 2015; 70: 967–82. https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2012097
Hakim ALL, Permadi AK, Bae W, Ryoo WS. A new integrated HPHT experimental apparatus to measure interfacial tension, swelling factor, and viscosity simultaneously. J Pet Explor Prod Technol. 2022; 12: 2405-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-022-01469-2
Hand JL, Pinczewski WV. Interpretation of swelling/extraction tests. SPE Res Eng. 1990; 5: 595-600. https://doi.org/10.2118/19471-PA
Tsau JS, Bui LH, Willhite GP. Swelling/extraction test of a small sample size for phase behavior study. SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA: SPE; 24-28th April 2010. https://doi.org/10.2118/129728-MS
Abdurrahman M, Permadi AK, Bae WS. An improved method for estimating minimum miscibility pressure through condensation–extraction process under swelling tests. J Pet Sci Eng. 2015; 131: 165-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.04.033
ASTM-API standard. Standard practice for manual sampling of petroleum and petroleum products. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: Reference number: FDUS 1732: 2017.
Ekundayo JM, Ghedan SG. Minimum miscibility pressure measurement with slimtube apparatus. SPE Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi: SPE; 16-18th September 2013. https://doi.org/10.2118/165966-MS
Flock DL, Nouar A. Parametric analysis on the determination of the minimum miscibility pressure in slim tube displacements. J Can Pet Technol. 1984; 23: 80-8. https://doi.org/10.2118/84-05-12
Holm WL. Evolution of the carbon dioxide flooding processes. J Pet Technol. 1987; 39: 1337–42. https://doi.org/10.2118/17134-PA
Sugihardjo S, Purnomo H. The changes of reservoir fluid properties in CO2 injection. LPMGB. 2009; 43(1): 11-16. https://doi.org/10.29017/SCOG.44.1.492
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Dedy Kristanto, Hariyadi, Luky A. Yusgiantoro