Keywords
Optimization
Wax formation
Genetic algorithm
Operational parameters
How to Cite
Abstract
Wax formation and deposition in crude oil pipelines pose a very significant challenge, such as flow restriction, increased cost of maintenance and potential shutdowns. The goals of this study are to reduce wax accumulation in the China National Petroleum Corporation-Niger Petroleum (CNPC-NP) pipeline network, which connects the Agadem oil fields to the SORAZ refinery, by optimizing critical operating conditions. The Reliability of Aspen HYSYS for analyzing wax behavior was validated by the simulation model that closely matched the real-world data, with a simulated flow rate of 182.49 m³/h with, only 0.27% higher than the actual 182 m³/h. The study suggested changing the operating condition using a genetic algorithm method of optimization, which indicates a slight increase in the pressure from 0.6 MPa to 0.65 MPa, while decreasing in temperature from 51°C to 48.5°C and a potential increase in the flow rate to 187.49 187.49 m³/h. Furthermore, the results of the optimization led to a decrease in wax thickness from 0.058 mm to 0.0409 mm, which indicated an improvement in pipeline operating conditions. Also, the economic analysis revealed, the total capital investment was roughly $3.3 million, and the annual operating expenses were estimated to be $2.4 million. The financial indicators include an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 9%, a Net Present Value (NPV) of $2.14 million and a Profitability Index (PI) of 1.99, all of which were higher than the IRR of the current CNPC-Niger Petroleum, which was 8%. The results show that the economic performance of the crude oil pipeline system can be improved, and wax formation risk can be effectively decreased by combining simulation-driven decision-making with strategic operational parameter adjustment.
References
Zhang AY, Cai M, Wei N, Li HT, Zhang C, Pei J, et al. Analysis of sensitivity to hydrate blockage risk in natural gas gathering pipeline. Pet Sci. 2024; 21(4): 2723-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2024.01.016
Liang H, Ma W, Yan K, Zhao J, Shen S, Chu J, et al. Experimental research on the reflection and response characteristics of pressure pulse waves for different gas pipeline blockage materials. Energy Sci Eng. 2024; 12(6): 2505-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.1759
Bossinov D, Ramazanova G, Turalina D. Comparison of measured and calculated high-viscosity crude oil temperature values in a pipeline during continuous pumping and shutdown modes. Int J Thermofluids. 2024; 24: 100950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2024.100950
Mohammad NE, Yassmen Y, Aly S, Hussein MH. A multi-objective optimization method for simulating the operation of natural gas transport system. Korean J Chem Eng. 2024; 41(6): 1609-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-024-00136-y
Kouhi MM, Shafiei A, Bekkuzhina T, Abutalip M. New intelligent models for predicting wax appearance temperature using experimental data-flow assurance implications. Fuel. 2025; 380: 133146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.133146
Wei X, Qiu R, Zhang B, Liu C, Wang G, Wang B, et al. Operation optimization of large-scale natural gas pipeline networks based on intelligent algorithm. Energy. 2024; 310: 133258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133258
Wen J, Jia Y, Lu Y, Luo H, Huang Z, You C, et al. Progress in wax deposition characteristics and prediction methods for high pour point and viscous crude oil water system. Processes. 2025; 13(4): 1115. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13041115
Das P, Rowe A, Wild P, Majumdar C. Modeling and optimization of a hydrogen blended natural gas transmission network: Effect of compressor electrification. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2025; 127: 497-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.03.380
Bashir TA, Zubairu AA, Dadet WP, Eletta OA. Parametric analysis of operating conditions on compressed natural gas production in Nigeria. J Eng Appl Sci. 2025; 72(1): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-025-00633-9
Ouladbrahim A, Belaidi I, Khatir S, Magagnini E, Capozucca R, Abdel Wahab M. Experimental crack identification of API X70 steel pipeline using improved artificial neural networks based on whale optimization algorithm. Mech Mater. 2022; 166: 104200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2021.104200
Sánchez-Lozano D, Aguado R, Escámez A, Awaafo A, Jurado F, Vera D. Techno-economic assessment of a hybrid PV-assisted biomass gasification CCHP plant for electrification of a rural area in the Savannah region of Ghana. Appl Energy. 2025; 377: 124446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124446
Leporini M, Terenzi A, Marchetti B, Giacchetta G, Corvaro F. Experiences in numerical simulation of wax deposition in oil and multiphase pipelines: Theory versus reality. J Pet Sci Eng. 2019; 174: 997-1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.11.087
van Aert RC, Schmid CH, Svensson D, Jackson D. Study specific prediction intervals for random‐effects meta‐analysis: a tutorial: prediction intervals in meta‐analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2021; 12(4): 429-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1490
Dong Y, Jiang H, Guo Y, Wang J. A novel crude oil price forecasting model using decomposition and deep learning networks. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2024; 133: 108111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108111
Liu C, Xiu X, Lyu H, Yang H, Zhang S. Development of PMUT based ultrasonic gas flowmeter with conical transducer cavities for the validation of industrial standards. Sens Actuators A Phys. 2024; 379: 115964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2024.115964
Qiu R, Tu R, Wei X, Zhang H, Gao M, Liao Q, et al. Evaluation and optimization of pipeline pricing strategies on oil product logistics in China. J Pipeline Sci Eng. 2024; 4(1): 100144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpse.2023.100144
Timilsina MS, Chaudhary Y, Shah AK, Lohani SP, Bhandari R, Uprety B. Syngas composition analysis for waste to methanol production: Techno-economic assessment using machine learning and Aspen plus. Renew Energy. 2024; 228: 120574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.120574
De S, Yadav S, Singh D, Sistla YS. Simplified approach of modeling air gasification of biomass in a bubbling fluidized bed gasifier using Aspen Plus as a simulation tool. J Environ Chem Eng. 2025; 13(2): 115402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.115402
Liu S, Zhou J, Liang G, Du P, Li Z, Li C. Optimizing large-scale hydrogen storage: A novel hybrid genetic algorithm approach for efficient pipeline network design. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2024; 66: 430-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.04.098
Ismail FB, Yuhana MIF, Mohammed SA, Sabri LS. Analytical prediction of gas hydrate formation conditions for oil and gas pipeline. Russ J Appl Chem. 2024; 97(1): 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1134/S107042722401004X
Razvarz S, Jafari R, Gegov A. Flow modelling and control in pipeline systems. Stud Syst Decis Control. 2021; 321(1): 25-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59246-2_2
Zheng X, Wang Z, Triantafyllou M, Karniadakis G. Fluid-structure interactions in a flexible pipe conveying two-phase flow. Int J Multiph Flow. 2021; 141: 103667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2021.103667
Al-Ali H. Process simulation for crude oil stabilization by using Aspen Hysys. Upstream Oil Gas Technol. 2021; 7: 100039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.upstre.2021.100039
Muñoz JAD, Ancheyta J. Techno-economic analysis of heating techniques for transportation of heavy crude oils by land pipeline. Fuel. 2023; 331: 125640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125640
Idachaba F, Rabiei M. Current technologies and the applications of data analytics for crude oil leak detection in surface pipelines. J Pipeline Sci Eng. 2021; 1(4): 436-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpse.2021.10.001
Mosqueda-Jiménez FW, Hipolito-Valencia BJ, Barajas-Fernandez J, Ponce-Ortega JM. Implementing genetic algorithms for optimizing integrated oil production systems. Braz J Chem Eng. 2021; 38(4): 929-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43153-021-00175-6
Huang XX, Moayedi H, Gong S, Gao W. Application of metaheuristic algorithms for pressure analysis of crude oil pipeline. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util Environ Eff. 2022; 44(2): 5124-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2019.1661550
Xu L, Hou L, Zhu Z, Li Y, Liu J, Lei T, et al. Mid-term prediction of electrical energy consumption for crude oil pipelines using a hybrid algorithm of support vector machine and genetic algorithm. Energy. 2021; 222: 119955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.119955
Ridzuan N, Al-Mahfadi M. Evaluation on the effects of wax inhibitor and optimization of operating parameters for wax deposition in Malaysian crude oil. Pet Sci Technol. 2017; 35(20): 1945-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10916466.2017.1373128
Xie M, Zhao J, Pei X. Maintenance strategy optimization of pipeline system with multi-stage corrosion defects based on heuristically genetic algorithm. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2023; 170: 553-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.12.041
Pauletto G, Galli F, Gaillardet A, Mocellin P, Patience GS. Techno economic analysis of a micro gas-to-liquid unit for associated natural gas conversion. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021; 150: 111457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111457
Salmachi A, Hosseini T, Shaikh RA, Dinovitser A, Abbott D. Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen pipe storage in decommissioned wellbores sourced from surplus renewable electricity. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2022; 47(56): 23710-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.160
Yu Q, Hao Y, Ali K, Hua Q, Sun L. Techno-economic analysis of hydrogen pipeline network in China based on levelized cost of transportation. Energy Convers Manag. 2024; 301: 118025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.118025
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Maman I. Salissou, Usman Hassan, Ibrahim Ayuba, Ahmed M. Inuwa