Efficiency Differential of Adopters and Non-adopters of Improved Technologies among Plantain Farmers in South-South, Nigeria

Authors

  • Samuel P. Jimmy Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development, Niger Delta University, Bayelsa State, Nigeria https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3185-2017
  • Julius E. Omeje National Institute for Freshwater Fisheries Research, New Bussa, Niger State, Nigeria https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8374-8887
  • Mfonobong O. Effiong Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria
  • Anthonia I. Achike Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nigeria, Nsukka. Enugu State, Nigeria
  • Chukwuemeka J. Arene Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nigeria, Nsukka. Enugu State, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9813.2026.13.1

Keywords:

Plantain farmer, Adoptive behavior, Efficiency differential, Productive efficiencies, Improved technologies.

Abstract

The study investigated efficiency differential of adopters and non-adopters of improved technologies among plantain farmers in South-South, Nigeria. The objectives of the study were to analyze production factors of adopters and non- adopters’, measure productive efficiencies of adopters and non-adopters, and evaluate the factors affecting the adoptive behaviour of farmers in the study area. Multi stage sampling technique was used to collect data from 280 plantain farmers. Descriptive statistics, stochastic frontier production/cost function models and logistic regression model were used for analysis. The results showed that adopter obtained higher yield than the non-adopters (p<0.01). Significant difference existed between adopters and non-adopters in terms of farm size, labour, inorganic fertilizers, pesticides, income, education, credit status and extension contacts. The mean technical efficiency of the famers was 0.66 and 0.52 for adopters and non-adopters respectively which differs significantly (p<0.01). The mean allocative efficiency was 0.57 and 0.44 for adopters and non-adopters respectively, the mean economic efficiency was 0.52 and 0.42 for adopters and non-adopters respectively. Farming experience, family size, adoption index, education, extension contacts, and membership of association were significant factors affecting adoptive choice of the farmers.The study recommended increased use of technologies, more extension contacts, and increased farmers’ membership of association.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT database [Internet]. Rome: FAO; 2018 (cited 2019 Dec 12). Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC

[2] Olumba CC, Onunka C. Banana and plantain in West Africa: production and marketing. Afr J Food Agric Nutr Dev. 2020; 20(2): 15474-89. https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.90.18365

[3] Evans School Policy Analysis and Research. Banana and plantain value chain, West Africa. EPAR Brief No. 239. Seattle: EPAR; 2013.

[4] Tijani I, Omonona B, Ashaolu O, Bamiro O. Economic analysis of plantain production in Irewole Local Government Area, Osun State, Nigeria. Adv Nat Appl Sci. 2009; 3(2): 183-8.

[5] Ayanwale A, Fatunbi A, Ojo M. Innovation opportunities in plantain production in Nigeria. In: Guide Book 1. Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA); 2016; Accra, Ghana.

[6] Girei A, Dire B, Yuguda R, Salihu M. Analysis of productivity and technical efficiency of cassava production in Ardo-Kola and Gassol Local Government Areas of Taraba State, Nigeria. Agric Fish. 2014; 3(1): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20140301.11

[7] Nyangena W, Juma OM. Impact of improved farm technologies on yields: the case of improved maize varieties and inorganic fertilizer in Kenya. Environ Dev Discuss Pap Ser. 2014; (14-02): 1-20.

[8] Norgrove L, Hauser S. Improving plantain (Musa spp. AAB) yields on smallholder farms in West and Central Africa. Food Secur. 2014; 6: 501-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-014-0365-1

[9] Olumba CC. Productivity of improved plantain technologies in Anambra State, Nigeria. Afr J Agric Resour. 2014; 9: 2196-204. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2014.8891

[10] Okoruwa V, Sowunmi F, Ogundele F, Omigie C. Resource-use efficiency: an application of stochastic frontier production function to plantain farmers in Ogun State, Nigeria. J Econ Sustain Dev. 2014; 5(21): 114-27.

[11] Idumah F, Owombo P, Ighodaro U, Mangodo C. Economic analysis of plantain production under agroforestry system in Edo State, Nigeria. Econ Anal. 2016; 21(1): 138-44.

[12] National Bureau of Statistics. Annual statistical report for 2011/2012. Abuja: NBS; 2012. p. 231-9.

[13] Coelli TJ. Recent developments in frontier modelling and efficiency measurement. Aust J Agric Econ. 1995; 39(3): 219-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.1995.tb00552.x

[14] Olumba C, Rahji M. An analysis of the determinants of the adoption of improved plantain technologies in Anambra State, Nigeria. J Agric Sustain. 2014; 5(2): 232-45.

[15] Muhammad B, Mad NS, Alias R, Dan IAL. Efficiency analysis of cotton production: a case study of Gassol and Lau Local Government Areas of Taraba State, Nigeria. E3S Web Conf. 2018; 52: 00030. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20185200030

[16] Farrell MJ. The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc Ser A. 1957; 120(3): 253-81. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100

[17] Gujarati DN, Porter DC. Basic econometrics. 5th ed. Singapore: McGraw-Hill/Irwin; 2009.

[18] Akintade TF, Okunlola JO, Akinbani AS. Factors influencing the adoption of plantain improved technologies among smallholder farmers in Edo State, Nigeria. Int J Biotechnol Healthc. 2016; 6(6): 96-100.

[19] Hui L, Diejun H, Qiuzhuo M, Wene Q, Hua L. Factors influencing the technology adoption behaviours of litchi farmers in China. Sustainability. 2020; 12: 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010271

[20] Onyeneke RU. Determinants of adoption of improved technologies in rice production in Imo State, Nigeria. Afr J Agric Res. 2017; 12(11): 888-96.

[21] Awotide BA, Karimov AA, Diagne A. Agricultural technology adoption, commercialization and smallholder rice farmers’ welfare in rural Nigeria. Agric Food Econ. 2016; 4(3): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-016-0047-8

[22] Awotide DO, Kehinde AL, Akorede TO. Metafrontier analysis of access to credit and technical efficiency among smallholder cocoa farmers in Southwest Nigeria. Int Bus Res. 2015; 8(1): 132. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v8n1p132

[23] Shadrach O. Effect of access to credit on agricultural productivity: evidence from cassava farmers in the Afigya-Kwabre District of Ghana. Int J Innov Res Soc Sci Strateg Manag Tech. 2017; 4(3): 55-67.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-26

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Efficiency Differential of Adopters and Non-adopters of Improved Technologies among Plantain Farmers in South-South, Nigeria. Glob. J. Agric. Innov. Res. Dev [Internet]. 2026 Mar. 26 [cited 2026 Mar. 27];13:1-18. Available from: https://avantipublishers.com/index.php/gjaird/article/view/1768

Similar Articles

21-22 of 22

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.