Imperfection Tolerances During the Erection of Steel Plate Girders and Geometrical Nonlinearities
PDF

Keywords

plate girder, GMNIA, initial imperfection, ultimate strength, erection, local instability

How to Cite

1.
Maiorana E, Donko MS, Poh’sié GH. Imperfection Tolerances During the Erection of Steel Plate Girders and Geometrical Nonlinearities. Int. J. Archit. Eng. Technol. [Internet]. 2021 Oct. 8 [cited 2022 Jul. 5];8:22-36. Available from: https://avantipublishers.com/index.php/ijaet/article/view/1071

Abstract

This work aims to prove that the strict initial imperfection tolerance limits proposed by the American AWS D1.1/D1.1M and the European EN 1090-2 codes could be relaxed for the webs of the most encountered steel I-plate girders subjected to local bend-buckling during their erection phase. To achieve this scope, a parametric study was done involving 36 perfect and 612 imperfect web models with varying aspect ratio, slenderness ratio, initial imperfection amplitude, and stress ratio using Abaqus/CAE by Finite Element (FE) linear buckling analyses then FE geometrically and materially nonlinear analyses with imperfections included (GMNIA). After investigating the results, two main research novelties were found. An easily applicable equation to determine the ultimate strength of webs subjected to direct stresses, which is a function of not only the slenderness ratio and stress ratio (as in other research) but also a function of the initial imperfection amplitude, was derived. Secondly, a tolerance limit equation that is a function of not only the slenderness ratio but also the stress ratio, thus considering the symmetry of the section of plate girders, has been derived. The derived tolerance limit equation provides acceptable and inclusive parameter-wise imperfection tolerances for webs of plate girders so as to relax strict and costly tolerance limits. The results obtained show that for monosymmetric I-plate girders during erection, EN 1090-2 and AWS D1.1/D1.1M tolerance limits can be relaxed to around 40% and 80% in less slender webs and close to 60% and 200% in more slender webs, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9821.2021.08.3
PDF

References

Ghadami A, Broujerdian V. Shear behavior of steel plate girders considering variations in geometrical properties. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2019; 153: pp. 567–577, doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.11.009.

Tetougueni C. D., Maiorana E., Zampieri P., Pellegrino C. Plate girders behaviour under in-plane loading: A review. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2019; 95(8): pp. 332–358, doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.09.021.

McAnallen LE, Padilla-Llano DA, Zhao X, Moen CD, Schafer BW, Eatherton MR. Initial geometric imperfection measurement and characterization of cold-formed steel C-section structural members with 3D non-contact measurement techniques. Struct. Stab. Res. Counc. Annu. Stab. Conf. 2014, SSRC 2014, pp. 566-590, 2014.

Massonet C. Tolerances in steel plated structures. IABSE Surv., 1980.

Rangelov N. A theoretical approach to the limiting of initial imperfections in steel plates. Der Stahlbau, 1992; 61(5): pp. 151-156.

Sadovský Z, Baláž I. Tolerances of initial deflections of steel plates and strength of I cross-section in compression and bending. J. Constr. Steel Res. 1996; 38(3): pp. 219-238, doi: 10.1016/0143-974X(96)00020-X.

Maiorana E, Pellegrino C, Modena C. Imperfections in steel girder webs with and without perforations under patch loading. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2009; 65(5): pp. 1121-1129, doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.10.007.

Kala J, Škaloud M, Melcher J, Kala Z. Imperfections in steel plated structures and their impact on ultimate strength. Proc. SDSS’ Rio 2010 Int. Colloq. Stab. Ductility Steel Struct. 2010; 2: pp. 779-785.

Beg D, Kuhlmann U, Davaine L, Braun B. Design of Plated Structures_ Eurocode 3_ Design of Steel Structures, Part 1-5 - Design of Plated Structures, First Edition. 2011.

EN 1993-1-5:2006 (E) Design of steel structures - Part 1-5: Plated structural elements. 2011; 1: no. 2005.

Clarin M. Plate Buckling Resistance - Patch Loading of Longitudinally Stiffened Webs and Local Buckling. 2007.

Fukumoto Y, Itoh Y. Basic From Strength Test of Steel Plates. 1984; 1: no. 344.

Timoshenko SP, Gere JM, Prager W. Theory of Elastic Stability, Second Edition. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1962; 29(1): pp. 220-221, doi: 10.1115/1.3636481.

Ziemian RD, Wiley J. Guide To Stability Design Criteria for Metal Structures. 2010.

Salman JC, Johnson EJ. Steel structures design & behaviour. 1996.

Segui WT. Steel Design, 2013; 53:no. 9.

Alinia MM, Gheitasi A, Shakiba M. Postbuckling and ultimate state of stresses in steel plate girders. Thin-Walled Struct., 2011; 49(4): pp. 455-464, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2010.12.008.

Graciano C, Casanova E, Martínez J. Imperfection sensitivity of plate girder webs subjected to patch loading. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2011; 67(7): pp. 1128-1133, doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.02.006.

Shin DK, Cho EY, Kim K. Ultimate flexural strengths of plate girders subjected to web local buckling. Int. J. Steel Struct. 2013; 13(2): pp. 291-303, doi: 10.1007/s13296-013-2008-3.

Kassem MR. The Behaviour and Design of Transverse Web Stiffeners in Bridge Girders. 1989.

Loorits K, Mekaniikka R. Classification of Cross Sections for steel beams in Different Design Codes. Raken. Mek. 1995; 28(1): pp. 19-33.

ِABAQUS. Abaqus 6.14. Abaqus 6.14 Anal. User’s Guid., 2014; p. 14.

Helwig T, Reagan H, Zhang Y, Espinoza O, Mercan B. Fabricated Plate Tolerances for Steel Bridges. 2015.

Hayward BA, Sadler N, Tordoff D. A Practical Approach to Design for Efficient Fabrication and Construction, 2002; no. 34.

Jayanta S. Local buckling and section classification. 2016; pp. 1-8, [Online]. Available: http://www.steel-insdag.org/TeachingMaterial/Chapter8.pdf.

AutoDesk Inc. How to Perform a Mesh Convergence Study | Simulation Mechanical | Autodesk Knowledge Network. 2017; [Online]. Available: https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/simulation-mechanical/learn-explore/caas/sfdcarticles/sfdcarticles/How-to-Perform-a-Mesh-Convergence-Study.html.

Pham NH, Pham CH, Rasmussen KJR. Incorporation of measured geometric imperfections into finite element models for cold-rolled aluminium sections. Lect. Notes Civ. Eng. 2018; 8: pp. 161-171, doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-6713-6_15.

Ellobody E. Finite Element Analysis and Design of Steel and Steel-Concrete Composite Bridges, 1st ed. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2014.

Galishnikova V, Dunaiski P, Pahl PJ. Geometrically Non-linear Analysis of Plane Trusses and Frames. 2009.

McGuire W, Gallagher RH, Ziemian RD. Matrix Structural Analysis, With MASTAN2. 1999; p. 480, [Online]. Available: http://books.google.com/books/about/Matrix_Structural_Analysis_With_MASTAN2.html?id=_I4AAAAACAAJ&pgis=1.

Przemieniecki JS. Theory of Matrix Structural Analysis. 1968.

Ritter K. Nonlinear problems. 2000; pp. 213-225, doi: 10.1007/bfb0103942.

Vasios N. Nonlinear Analysis of Structures. NASA Contract. Reports, 2015.

Wood RD. Analysis of geometrically nonlinear structures, 1997; 28: no. 1.

Basler K, Bung-Tseng Y, Mueller JA, Thürlimann B. Web buckling tests on welded plate girders - Overall introduction and Part 1 The test girders. Fritz Eng. Lab. Lehigh Univ. 1960; 165: 251-11.

Basler K, Yen BT, Mueller JA, Thurlimann B. Web buckling tests on welded plate girders. 1960.

Hyams DG. GraphExpert professional documentation. Release 1.1.3. 2014.

Hyams DG. CurveExpert Professional Documentation. Hyams Dev. 2018; p. 213, [Online]. Available: https://bit.ly/2UBpckG.

AWS D1.1/D1.1M:2010 American Welding Society, Structural Welding Code - Steel. 2010.

EN 1090-2:2018 (E) Execution of steel structures and aluminium structures - Part 2: Technical requirements for steel structures. 2018.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Emanuele Maiorana, Maël Sonna Donko, Guillaume Hervé Poh’sié