Determination of Multiple-target Equivalent Static Wind Load of Large-span Roof Structures based on Clustering Analysis Techniques
Abstract - 350
PDF

Keywords

Clustering analysis
Inertial force method
Large-span roof structure
Equivalent static wind load
Load-response-correlation method

How to Cite

1.
Huang M-H, Fu C-L, Hsu Y-W, Lo Y-L. Determination of Multiple-target Equivalent Static Wind Load of Large-span Roof Structures based on Clustering Analysis Techniques. Int. J. Archit. Eng. Technol. [Internet]. 2023 Dec. 27 [cited 2024 Dec. 19];10:118-39. Available from: https://avantipublishers.com/index.php/ijaet/article/view/1439

Abstract

Spatial structures in modern society exhibit a city’s distinguishing features and show its strength in building technology. Large-span roof structures are mostly seen among spatial structures for various activities. Large-span roof structures are usually sensitive to wind loads due to their lightness in materials and curved geometric appearance. However, spatial structures are generally designed with many structural members, making it challenging to determine adequate load distributions for structural safety analysis. This paper intends to introduce the concept of the multiple-target equivalent static wind loads and to demonstrate how to reduce the heavy computational burden when the structural designer needs to consider multiple loading effects of the target structure. The wind tunnel test of an elliptical-shaped stadium structure with a flat roof is first conducted to show the fundamental aerodynamic characteristics. The methodologies of the background-component wind force based on the load-response-correlation (LRC) method and the resonant-component wind force based on the inertial force method are then introduced for the specification of single-target equivalent static wind loads. Finally, the clustering analysis technique is adopted to explain the concept of the multiple-target equal static wind loads. A decay index is proposed to indicate how the clustering technique improves the specification of equivalent static wind loads.

https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9821.2023.10.9
PDF

References

Takahashi T. AIJ Recommendations for Loads on Buildings 2015. Architectural Institute of Japan; 2019.

Eurocode 1: Actions on structures - Part 1-4: General actions - Wind actions (includes Amendment A1: 2010 + Corrigendum AC: 2010) English translation of DIN EN 1991-1-4:2010-12. DIN-Sprachendienst; 2010.

Guide for the assessment of wind actions and effects on structures (CNR-DT 207/2008), Advisory Committee on technical recommendations for constructions. National Research Council of Italy; 2010.

International Standard: Wind actions on structures (ISO 4354:2009). International Standard Organization; 2009.

Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures (ASCE/SEI 7-22). Structural Engineering Institute, American Society of Civil Engineers; 2022.

Davenport AG. Gust loading factors. J Struct Div. 1967; 93: 11-34. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0001692

Davenport A. The representation of the dynamic effects of turbulent wind by equivalent static wind loads. Proceedings of International Engineering Symposium on Structural Steel, Chicago: 1993.

Solari G. Gust buffeting I: Peak wind velocity and equivalent pressure. J Struct Eng. 1993; 119: 365-82. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:2(365)

Solari G. Gust buffeting II: Dynamic along-wind response. J Struct Eng. 1993; 119: 383-98. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:2(383)

Zhou Y, Gu M, Xiang H. Alongwind static equivalent wind loads and responses of tall buildings. Part I: Unfavorable distributions of static equivalent wind loads. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 1999; 79: 135-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00297-3

Zhou Y, Gu M, Xiang H. Alongwind static equivalent wind loads and responses of tall buildings. Part II: Effects of mode shapes. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 1999; 79: 151-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00298-5

Zhou Y, Kareem A, Gu M. Gust loading factors for design applications. Proceedings of the 10th ICWE, Copenhagen: 1999.

Kareem A, Zhou Y. Gust loading factor—past, present and future. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 2003; 91: 1301-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2003.09.003

Chen X, Kareem A. Equivalent static wind loads for buffeting response of bridges. J Struct Eng. 2001; 127: 1467-75. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:12(1467)

Yang C. A preliminary investigation on the design wind loads of arched roofs. Master thesis (Chinese). Tamkang University , 2005.

Lin Y, Wang B. Application of equivalent static wind loads on bridge design. Struct Eng. 2014; 29: 27-39.

Lo YL, Wu CH. Estimation for equivalent static wind load of dome roof structures. Proceedings of the 16th East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction, Brisbane: Springer; 2019, p. 415-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8079-6_40

Kasperski M, Niemann H-J. The L.R.C. (load-response-correlation) - method a general method of estimating unfavourable wind load distributions for linear and non-linear structural behaviour. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 1992; 43: 1753-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(92)90588-2

Kasperski M. Extreme wind load distributions for linear and nonlinear design. Eng Struct. 1992; 14: 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(92)90005-B

Wang Y. Application of LRC method on the equivalent static wind load of large span structures. Master thesis (Chinese). Tamkang University, 2011.

Katsumura A, Tamura Y, Nakamura O. Universal wind load distribution simultaneously reproducing largest load effects in all subject members on large-span cantilevered roof. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 2007; 95: 1145-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2007.01.020

Holmes J. Optimized peak load distributions. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 1992; 41: 267-76.

Holmes JD. Effective static load distributions in wind engineering. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 2002; 90: 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(01)00164-7

Hongo T. Experimental studies of fluctuating wind pressures on dome-like roofs. PhD thesis (Japanese). Wind Engineers, JAWE, 1995, (62): p. 23-33. https://doi.org/10.5359/jawe.1995.23

Uematsu Y, Yamada M, Inoue A, Hongo T. Wind loads and wind-induced dynamic behavior of a single-layer latticed dome. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 1997; 66: 227–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00133-5

Holmes J. Equivalent static load distributions for resonant dynamic response of bridges. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Wind Engineering, Copenhagen: 1999.

Davenport A. Missing links in wind engineering. Proceedings of the 10th ICWE, Copenhagen: 1999.

Song J. Optimized equivalent static wind load of large-span-roof structures based on cluster analysis technique. Master thesis (Chinese). National Taipei University of Technology; 2022.

Huang MH, Lo YL. A refined method of multi-target equivalent static wind loads: A bridge case. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 2021; 212: 104609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104609

Chen C-W, Li Y-C, Lo Y-L. Interference effects on the square and circular cross-sectional high-rise buildings under turbulent flows. Inte J Archit Eng Tech. 2022; 9: 18-36. https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9821.2022.09.2

Counihan J. Simulation of an adiabatic urban boundary layer in a wind tunnel. Atmospheric Environment (1967) 1973; 7: 673-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(73)90150-9

Taiwan Wind Code. Ministry of Interior 2015.

Irwin HPAH, Cooper KR, Girard R. Correction of distortion effects caused by tubing systems in measurements of fluctuating pressures. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 1979; 5: 93-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(79)90026-6

Quality assurance manual: Wind engineering studies of buildings. 3rd ed. Australian Wind Engineering Society; 2019, AWES-QAM-1-2019.

Prévost JH, Bagrianski S. An introduction to matrix structural analysis and finite element methods. World Scientific; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1142/10358

Uematsu Y, Watanabe K, Sasaki A, Motohiko Yamada, Hongo T. Wind-induced dynamic response and resultant load estimation of a circular flat roof. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 1999; 83: 251-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(99)00076-8

Uematsu Y, Yamada M. Wind-induced dynamic response and its load estimation for structural frames of circular flat roofs with long spans. Wind Struct. 2002; 5: 49-60. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2002.5.1.049

Uematsu Y, Moteki T, Hongo T. Model of wind pressure field on circular flat roofs and its application to load estimation. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 2008; 96: 1003-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2007.06.025

Simiu E, Yeo D. Wind effects on structures: modern structural design for wind. 4th ed. Wiley Blackwell; 2017.

Chopra A. Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering. 5th ed. Pearson; 2019.

Clough R, Penzien J. Dynamics of structures. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill; 1993.

Newland D. Introduction to random vibrations, spectral & wavelet analysis. 3rd ed. Dover Publication Inc.; 1993.

Holmes JD, Bekele SA. Wind loading of structures. 4th ed. CRC Press; 2020. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429296123

MacQueen J. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proceedings of 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, University of California Press; 1967, p. 281-97.

Huang Z. Extensions to the k-means algorithm for clustering large data sets with categorical values. Data Min Knowl Discov. 1998; 2: 283-304.

Li Y, Yang Q, Tian Y, Zhu Y. Refinement analysis of multi-target equivalent static wind loads for large-span roofs. J Cent S Univ. 2016; 47: 2485-94.

Scitovski R, Sabo K, Martínez-Álvarez F, Ungar Š. Cluster analysis and applications. Switzerland: Springer Cham; 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74552-3

Tamura Y, Suganuma S, Kikuchi H, Hibi K. Proper orthogonal decomposition of random wind pressure field. J Fluids Struct. 1999; 13: 1069-95. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.1999.0242

Kikuchi H, Tamura Y, Ueda H, Hibi K. Proper orthogonal decomposition study of fluctuating wind pressures acting on a tall building. J Struct Construction Engineering. J Struct Constr Eng. 1998; 63: 25-32. https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.63.25_2

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Ming-Hui Huang, Chung-Lin Fu, Yu-Wen Hsu, Yuan-Lung Lo

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.