Keywords
Office
Tower
Mixed-use
Residential
Space efficiency
Categories
How to Cite
Abstract
This paper offers an in-depth comparative analysis of space efficiency in contemporary tall towers, specifically focusing on residential, office, hotel and mixed-use functions (166 cases in total). To the best of current knowledge, no study in the existing literature has focused on this critical and topical subject. The findings underscore the pivotal importance of central core planning and prismatic building forms, which emerge as crucial design elements for optimizing space efficiency across all building types. Central core planning ensures the strategic placement of essential elements like elevators and stairwells, thereby minimizing wasted space and maximizing usable floor area. Meanwhile, prismatic building forms, characterized by their straightforward geometric shapes, facilitate more efficient construction processes and space usage. Average space efficiencies of residential, office, hotel and mixed towers were 76%, 71%, 81%, and 71%, whereas core area to GFA ratio were 19%, 26%, 16% and 26%, respectively. Values fluctuated from the lowest of 55% and 4% to the highest of 94% and 38%. By exploring these dimensions, this research offers valuable insights for the architects and developers, guiding them in the creation of tall buildings that are not only architecturally impressive but also economically viable and highly efficient. This comprehensive analysis serves as a critical resource, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach that considers core planning, structural integrity, and material choice in the design and construction of tall edifices. This holistic perspective is essential for professionals aiming to achieve the highest standards of efficiency and practicality in their architectural endeavors.
References
Peters T. The development of the tall building. Struct Eng Int. 1992; 2(3): 161-4. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686692780628433
Ray P, Roy S. Skyscrapers: origin, history, evolution and future. J Today's Ideas-Tomorrow's Technol. 2018; 6(1): 9-20. https://doi.org/10.15415/jotitt.2018.61001
Memon S, Zain M, Zhang D, Rehman S, Usman M, Lee D. Emerging trends in the growth of structural systems for tall buildings. J Struct Integrity Maint. 2020; 5(3): 155-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/24705314.2020.1765270
Weingardt R. Homer gage balcom and the empire state building. Leadersh Manag Eng. 2011; 11(2): 209-18. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000122
Jacobsson M, Wilson T. Revisiting the construction of the Empire State Building: Have we z something? Bus Horiz. 2018; 61(1): 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.09.004
Sharma M, Sain H. A review on seismic analysis of connected and high rise buildings. Int J Eng Trends Appl. 2024; 11(1): 18-21.
Hassan W, Elmorsy M. Database trends and critical review of seismic performance tests on high strength steel reinforced concrete components. Eng Struct. 2021; 239: 112092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112092
Fernando D, Navaratnam S, Rajeev P, Sanjayan J. Study of technological advancement and challenges of façade system for sustainable building: Current design practice. Sustainability. 2023; 15(19): 14319. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914319
Chen L, Hu Y, Wang R, Li X, Chen Z, Hua J, et al. Dong L. Green building practices to integrate renewable energy in the construction sector: a review. Environ Chem Lett. 2024; 22(2): 751-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-023-01675-2
Heidari M, Thangavel S, Al Naamani E, Khashehchi M. Emerging trends in smart green building technologies. Sustain Technol Energy Efficient Buildings. 2024; 24: 313. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003496656-15
Wang C, Che Y, Xia M, Lin C, Chen Y, Li X, et al. Fan G. The evolution and future directions of green buildings research: a scientometric analysis. Buildings. 2024; 14(2): 345. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14020345
Pietrzak J. Opportunities of building tall and green-an overview from a European perspective. Acta Sci Pol, Architectura. 2024; 23: 167-88. https://doi.org/10.22630/ASPA.2024.23.13
Alkhatib F, Daris A, Almasaudi A, Alawag A, Baarimah A, Alakhali A. Review and conceptual workflow for enhancing wind loads design of sustainable asymmetrical tall buildings. In: 2024 ASU International Conference in Emerging Technologies for Sustainability and Intelligent Systems (ICETSIS); 2024 Jan 28; IEEE. p. 812-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETSIS61505.2024.10459521
Erkoç Y, Torunbalcı N. Design of inclined-form buildings: architectural and structural considerations. J Architect Eng. 2024; 30(3): 03124003. https://doi.org/10.1061/JAEIED.AEENG-1777
Al-Kodmany K, Ali M, Zhang T. Importing urban giants: re-imaging Shanghai and Dubai with skyscrapers. ArchNet-IJAR. 2013; 7(2): 22.
Roche Cárcel J. The spatialization of time and history in the skyscrapers of the twenty-first century in Shanghai. City, Territory and Architecture. 2021; 8(1): 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-021-00136-z
Botti G. The Skyscraper: Go East, Go High, Go Hybrid. In: Designing Emerging Markets: A Quantitative History of Architectural Globalisation; 2023 May 23. Singapore: Springer Nature; p. 163-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1552-1_5
Thai H, Ngo T, Uy B. A review on modular construction for high-rise buildings. Structures. 2020; 28: 1265-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.070
Vosloo C. Early sustainable architecture in hanging skyscrapers: A comparison of two financial office buildings. Acta Structilia. 2020; 27(1): 144-77. https://doi.org/10.18820/24150487/as27i1.6
Scaramozzino D, Lacidogna G, Carpinteri A. New trends towards enhanced structural efficiency and aesthetic potential in tall buildings: The case of diagrids. Appl Sci. 2020; 10(11): 3917. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10113917
Alotaibi F, Sinclair B. Tall buildings, high expectations, towering responsibilities: Critically considering skyscrapers, urbanism and sustainability. In: Couceiro da Costa MJR, Roseta F, Couceiro da Costa S, Lages JP, Eds. Architectural Research Addressing Societal Challenges. CRC Press; 2017, pp. 535-42.
Watts S, Kalita N, Maclean M. The economics of super-tall towers. The Struct Des Tall Spec Buildings. 2007; 16(4): 457-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.424
Barton J, Watts S. Office vs. residential: the economics of building tall. CTBUH J. 2013; 2: 38-43.
Moon KS, de Oliveira Miranda MD. Conjoined towers for livable and sustainable vertical urbanism. Int J High-Rise Buildings. 2020; 9(4): 387-96.
Özşahin B. An assessment of the relation between architectural and structural systems in the design of tall buildings in Turkey. Buildings. 2022; 12(10): 1649. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101649
Mamati N, Kuruşcu A, Parsa A. Examination of the core as a rigidity center in high-rise buildings. Eur J Res Dev. 2022; 2(2): 190-212. https://doi.org/10.56038/ejrnd.v2i2.57
Fakıoğlu Gedik B, Ay B. The impact of service core reduction in supertall buildings: a study on structural design, embodied carbon, and leasable floor area. Archit Sci Rev. 2023; 66: 144-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2023.2182271
Yung C, Ismail L, Abd Wahab I, Hanapi N. Skyscrapers architectural form effects on airflow. J Design + Build. 2021;14(1): 103-12.
Goncikowski M. Landmarks of the metropolis: the types of forms of Varsovian skyscrapers as compared to global precedence. Buildings. 2022; 12(10): 1507. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101507
Jung C, Awad R, Awad J. A study of optimal design process for complex-shaped skyscrapers' structural systems in the United Arab Emirates. Ain Shams Eng J. 2022;13(5): 101683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.101683
Elhegazy H, Ebid A, Mahdi I, Haggag S, Rashid I. Selecting optimum structural system for RC multi-story buildings considering direct cost. Structures. 2020; 24: 296-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.01.039
Alhaddad W, Halabi Y, Xu H, Lei H. A comprehensive introduction to outrigger and belt-truss system in skyscrapers. Structures 2020; 27: 989-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.06.028
Chaudhary N. Construction of skyscrapers: boon or bane from an economic perspective. J Tikapur Mult Campus. 2024; 7(1-2): 69-84. https://doi.org/10.3126/jotmc.v7i1-2.63173
Chigozie A. Skyscrapers construction technology: A BIM approach. J Env Design Constr Mgmt. 2020; 20(4): 355-81.
Finnigan S, Gerardy J, Popa N, Trabucco D. Steel and skyscrapers: a productive history and a sustainable future. CTBUH J. 2019; 4: 28-35.
Almusaed A, Almssad A. Sustainable wooden skyscrapers for the future cities. In: Du G, Zhou X, Eds. Wood Industry-Past, Present and Future Outlook. IntechOpen; 2022. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.105809
Ilgın H. Space efficiency in contemporary supertall residential buildings. Architecture. 2021; 1:25-37. https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture1010004
Ilgın H. Space efficiency in contemporary supertall office buildings. J Archit Eng. 2021; 27: 04021024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000486
Aslantamer Ö, Ilgın H. Space efficiency in tall hotel towers. Buildings. 2024; 14(7): 2051. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14072051
Ilgın H. A study on space efficiency in contemporary supertall mixed-use buildings. J Build Eng. 2023; 69: 106223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106223
Dal Molin R, Ragiv S, Giacomello E. Tall buildings and city development: comparison of five case studies. CTBUH J. 2023; 2: 28-35.
Charney I, Drozdz M, Rosen G. Venerated skylines under pressure: a view of three cities. Urban Geography. 2022; 43(7): 1087-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2021.1897742
Okbaz F, Sev A. A model for determining the space efficiency in non-orthogonal high-rise office buildings. J Fac Eng Archit Gazi Univ. 2023; 38: 113-25. https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.831937
Ibrahimy R, Mohmmand M, Elham F. An evaluation of space use efficiency in residential houses, Kabul City. J Res Appl Sci Biotechnol. 2023; 2: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.55544/jrasb.2.3.1
Höjer M, Hongo Y, Francart N, Kishita Y. Measuring space efficiency and estimating the potential for reduced operational and embodied energy use for office spaces. Sustainability. 2023; 16(1): 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010332
Goessler T, Kaluarachchi Y. Smart adaptive homes and their potential to improve space efficiency and personalization. Buildings. 2023; 13(5): 1132. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051132
Hamid G, Elsawi M, Yusra O. The impacts of spatial parameters on space efficiency in hybrid villa-apartments in greater Khartoum. J Archit Plan. 2022; 34: 425-40. https://doi.org/10.33948/JAP-KSU-34-4-4
Suga R. Space efficiency in hotel development [Thesis]. MODUL University Vienna; 2021.
Arslan Kılınç G. Improving a model for determining space efficiency of tall office buildings [Thesis]. Mimar Sinan Fine Art University; 2019.
Von Both P. A stakeholder- and function-based planning method for space-efficient buildings. P Von Both. 2019; IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 2019; 323: 012040. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/323/1/012040
Höjer M, Mjörnell K. Measures and steps for more efficient use of buildings. Sustainability. 2018; 10(6): 1949. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061949
Nam H, Shim J. An analysis of the change in space efficiency based on various tall building corner shapes and lease spans. J Archit Inst Korea Plan Des. 2016; 32: 13-20. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2016.32.11.13
Zhang L, Zhang L, Wang Y. Shape optimization of free-form buildings based on solar radiation gain and space efficiency using a multi-objective genetic algorithm in the severe cold zones of China. Solar Energy. 2016; 132: 38-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.02.053
Sev A, Özgen A. Space efficiency in high-rise office buildings. METU J Faculty Archit. 2009; 26: 69-89. https://doi.org/10.4305/METU.JFA.2009.2.4
Saari A, Tissari T, Valkama E, Seppänen O. The effect of a redesigned floor plan, occupant density and the quality of indoor climate on the cost of space, productivity and sick leave in an office building: A case study. Build Environ. 2006; 41: 1961-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.07.012
Kim H-I, Elnimeiri M. Space efficiency in multi-use tall buildings. In: Tall buildings in historical cities-culture and technology for sustainable cities. Chicago, IL, USA: CTBUH; 2004. p. 748-55.
Opoku A, Ahmed V, Akotia J. Choosing an appropriate research method. In: Ahmed V, Opoku A, Aziz Z, Eds. Research methodology in the built environment. London: Routledge; 2016, PP. 32-49.
Noor K. Case study: A strategic research methodology. Am J Appl Sci. 2008; 5(11): 1602-4. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2008.1602.1604
Marsh E, Allen S, Hattam L. Tackling uncertainty in life cycle assessments for the built environment: A review. Build Environ. 2023; 231: 109941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109941
Saka A, Taiwo R, Saka N, Salami B, Ajayi S, Akande K, et al. GPT models in construction industry: Opportunities, limitations, and a use case validation. Develop Built Environ. 2023; 12: 100300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100300
Pan Y, Zhu M, Lv Y, Yang Y, Liang Y, Yin R, et al. Building energy simulation and its application for building performance optimization: A review of methods, tools, and case studies. Adv Appl Energy. 2023; 10: 100135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2023.100135
CTBUH, Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat. Illinois Institute of Technology; S.R. Crown Hall, 3360 South State Street, Chicago, Illinois, USA. Available from: www.ctbuh.org (accessed on 02 October 2024).
Oldfield P, Doherty B. Offset cores: Trends, drivers and frequency in tall buildings. CTBUH J. 2019; 1(2): 40-5.
Sung L, Kim Y. The study on the height standard and the slenderness ratio according to location types of mixed-use residential tall buildings. J Korea Academia-Ind Cooperation Soc. 2012; 13(6): 2779-88. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2012.13.6.2779
Alotaibi F, Sinclair B. Tall buildings, high expectations, towering responsibilities: Critically considering skyscrapers, urbanism and sustainability. In: da Costa MJRC, Roseta F, da Costa SC, Lages JP, Eds. Architectural Research Addressing Societal Challenges. London: CRC Press; 2017. pp. 535-42. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315226255-82
Oldfield P, Trabucco D, Wood A. Five energy generations of tall buildings: An historical analysis of energy consumption in high-rise buildings. J Architect. 2009; 14(5): 591-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602360903119405
Kavyashree B, Patil S, Rao V. Evolution of outrigger structural system: A state-of-the-art review. Arabian J Sci Eng. 2021; 46(11): 10313-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-06074-9
Amoussou C, Lei H, Alhaddad W, Halabi Y. Simplified modeling and analysis method for skyscrapers with outrigger system. Structures. 2021; 33; 1033-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.04.096
Tiwary A. Different types of outrigger system in high-rise buildings: A preliminary comparative seismic analysis in a 40-story RC building. Innov Infrastruct Solut. 2022; 7(6): 347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00946-1
Xing L, Gardoni P, Zhou Y, Aguaguiña M. Optimal outrigger locations and damping parameters for single-outrigger systems considering earthquake and wind excitations. Eng Struct. 2021; 245: 112868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112868
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Hüseyin Emre Ilgın, Özlem Nur Aslantamer