Keywords
Leak-off test
Extended leak-off test
Formation integrity test
Automated leak-off test
Drilling process & digitalization
How to Cite
Funding data
-
Iran National Science Foundation
Grant numbers 98011044 -
Research Institute of Petroleum Industry
Grant numbers 98011044
Abstract
The drilling and research communities are leading the way toward more digitally-controlled operations to ensure that the drilling process takes place as safely and gently as possible with the lowest possible carbon footprint. Today’s cutting-edge operations are run on large high-performance drilling installations where operations are largely run remotely from the driller’s operating station. Digitalization of the drilling process is the goal for performing drilling operations remotely from onshore. Leak-off test (LOT) or extended leak-off test (XLOT) plays a critical role in the petroleum industry. Therefore, recognizing all affecting parameters on LOT/XLOT and Formation integrity test (FIT) performance is vital. Because, in some cases, it is not possible to fully understand what happened during the test, having a deep insight into the LOT procedure is very important. One of the current study's main objectives is to thoroughly explain all stages of these tests and assemble all the significant parameters. Thus, many scientific papers on these tests were deeply reviewed and were classified into four main groups focusing on the application of LOT/XLOT (i) in stress estimation and geomechanical studies, (ii) concerning hydraulic fracturing, (iii) concerning wellbore stability, and (iv) numerical modeling, and then, the corresponding discussions were conducted. It was found that in-situ stress estimation is the most common application of the leak-off test.
Moreover, considering the importance of LOT and the desire to digitize operations in the oil and gas industry, it was found that the automatic LOT/XLOT is a fully required approach. The primary purpose of this study, which is hence considered its main contribution, is to prepare a LOT flowchart that would set off the further code development tasks of the field. The fundamental code of the present study was written and checked using a real dataset in a Python environment. The results were satisfying and indicated a successful start, which lays a foundation for future automated LOT/XLOT tests.
References
Golsanami N, Jayasuriya MN, Yan W, Fernando SG, Liu X, Cui L, et al. Characterizing clay textures and their impact on the reservoir using deep learning and Lattice-Boltzmann simulation applied to SEM images. Energy. 2021; 240: 122599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122599
Golsanami N, Bakhshi E, Yan W, Dong H, Barzgar E, Zhang G, et al. Relationships between the geomechanical parameters and Archie’s coefficients of fractured carbonate reservoirs: a new insight. Energy Source Part A. 2020; 2020: 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2020.1849463
Bakhshi E, Golsanami N, Chen L. Numerical modeling and lattice method for characterizing hydraulic fracture propagation: a review of the numerical, experimental, and field studies. Arch Comput Methods Eng. 2020; 28: 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09501-6
Bakhshi E, Rasouli V, Ghorbani A, Marji MF. Lattice numerical simulations of hydraulic fractures interacting with natural oblique interfaces. Int J Min Geo-Eng. 2019; 53: 83-9. https://doi.org/10.22059/IJMGE.2019.270665.594767
Golsanami N, Zhang X, Yan W, Yu L, Dong H, Dong X, et al. NMR-based study of the pore types’ contribution to the elastic response of the reservoir rock. Energies (Basel). 2021; 14(5): 1513. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14051513
Golsanami N, Fernando SG, Jayasuriya MN, Yan W, Dong H, Cui L, et al. Fractal properties of various clay minerals obtained from SEM images. Geofluids. 2021; 2021: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5516444
Bosch M, Mukerji T, Gonzalez EF. Seismic inversion for reservoir properties combining statistical rock physics and geostatistics: A review. Geophysics 2010; 75: 75A165-76. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3478209
Lim J-S. Reservoir properties determination using fuzzy logic and neural networks from well data in offshore Korea. J Pet Sci Eng. 2005; 49:182-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2005.05.005
Grana D, della Rossa E. Probabilistic petrophysical-properties estimation integrating statistical rock physics with seismic inversion. Geophysics. 2010; 75: 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3386676
Aadnoy BS, Mostafavi V, Hareland G. Fracture mechanics interpretation of leak-off tests. Kuwait International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition, December 14-16, 2009, Kuwait: SPE; 2009. https://doi.org/10.2118/126452-MS
Gjønnes M, Cruz AMGL, Horsrud P, Holt RM. Leak-off tests for horizontal stress determination? J Pet Sci Eng. 1998; 20: 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-4105(97)00053-3
Shaghaghi T, Ghadrdan M, Tolooiyan A. Effect of rock mass permeability and rock fracture leak-off coefficient on the pore water pressure distribution in a fractured slope. Simul Model Pract Theory. 2020; 105: 102167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2020.102167
Lee D, Birchwood R, Bratton T. Leak-off test interpretation and modeling with application to geomechanics. Gulf Rocks 2004 - 6th North America Rock Mechanics Symposium, Houston, Texas, USA, 5-9 June, NARMS 2004, OnePetro; 2004, ARMA-04-547.
Allerstorfer C. Investigation of the" plastic-behavior" region in leak-off tests (Master Thesis). University of Leoben; Austria: 2011. Available from https://pure.unileoben.ac.at/portal/files/2457780/AC08882729n01vt.pdf
Couzens-Schultz BA, Chan AW. Stress determination in active thrust belts: An alternative leak-off pressure interpretation. J Struct Geol. 2010; 32:1061-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2010.06.013
Zoback MD, Barton CA, Brudy M, Castillo DA, Finkbeiner T, Grollimund BR, et al. Determination of stress orientation and magnitude in deep wells. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 2003; 40:1049-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2003.07.001
de Bree P, Walters JV. Micro/minifrac test procedures and interpretation for in situ stress determination. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr. 1989; 26: 515-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(89)91429-0
Yamamoto K. Implementation of the extended leak-off test in deep wells in Japan. In: Sugawara K, Obara Y, Sato A, Eds., Rock Stress. London: CRC Press; 2020, p. 579-84. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003078890-90
Pallikathekathil ZJ, Yang XW, Hafezy S, Puspitasari R, Harris RI, Sutton JT. Inversion of advanced full waveform sonic data provides magnitudes of minimum and maximum horizontal stress for calibrating the geomechanics model in a gas storage reservoir. SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, November 17-19, Virtual: OnePetro; 2020. https://doi.org/10.2118/202260-MS
Baouche R, Sen S, Boutaleb K. Present day In-situ stress magnitude and orientation of horizontal stress components in the eastern Illizi basin, Algeria: A geomechanical modeling. J Struct Geol. 2020; 132: 103975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2019.103975
Addis MA, Hanssen TH, Yassir N, Willoughby DR, Enever J. A comparison of leak-off test and extended leak-off test data for stress estimation. SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics in Petroleum Engineering, Trondheim: Society of Petroleum Engineers; 1998. https://doi.org/10.2118/47235-MS
Bell JS. Investigating stress regimes in sedimentary basins using information from oil industry wireline logs and drilling records. Geol Soc. 1990; 48: 305-25. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1990.048.01.26
Postler DP. Pressure integrity test interpretation. SPE/IADC drilling conference, Amsterdam: Society of Petroleum Engineers; 1997. https://doi.org/10.2118/37589-MS
Raaen MA. The pump-in/flowback test improves routine minimum horizontal stress magnitude determination in deep wells. In: Lu M, Ed., In-Situ Rock Stress: Measurement, Interpretation and Application, Trondheim: Taylor & Francis; 2006, p. 73-8. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439833650.ch10
Jing L, Hudson JA. Numerical methods in rock mechanics. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 2002; 39: 409-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00065-5
Kunze KR, Steiger RP. Accurate in-situ stress measurements during drilling operations. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE; 1992. https://doi.org/10.2118/24593-MS
Raaen AM, Skomedal E, Kjørholt H, Markestad P, Økland D. Stress determination from hydraulic fracturing tests: the system stiffness approach. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 2001; 38: 529-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(01)00020-X
Raaen AM, Brudy M. Pump-in/flowback tests reduce the estimate of horizontal in-situ stress significantly. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans: SPE; 2001. https://doi.org/10.2118/71367-MS
Vavilov MB, Sekacheva YV, Chernov VI, Lyutikov KV, Perebatov AS. Impact of casing pressure test after waiting on cement on cement bond quality (Russian). SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference, One Petro; 2020. https://doi.org/10.2118/201861-RU
van Oort E, Vargo R. Improving formation strength tests and their interpretation. SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam: SPE; 2007. https://doi.org/10.2118/105193-MS
Rezmer-Cooper IM, Rambow FHK, Arasteh M, Hashem MN, Swanson B, Gzara K. Real-time formation integrity tests using downhole data. in SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, New Orleans: SPE; 2000. https://doi.org/10.2118/59123-MS
Morita N, Black AD, Guh G-F. Theory of lost circulation pressure. in SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, New Orleans: SPE; 1990. https://doi.org/10.2118/20409-MS
Almeida MA. Computer-aided analysis of formation pressure integrity tests used in oil well drilling. Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College, 1986.
Altun G, Langlinais J, Bourgoyne AT. Application of a new model to analyze leak-off tests. SPE Drilling & Completion 2001; 16: 108-16. https://doi.org/10.2118/72061-PA
Ishijima Y, J. Roegiers. Fracturei nitiation and breakdowpnr essure--are they similar? The 24th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS), American Rock Mechanics Association; 1983.
Horsrud P, Risnes R, Bratli RK. Fracture initiation pressures in permeable poorly consolidated sands. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr. 1982; 19:2 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(82)91362-6
Okland D, Gabrielsen GK, Gjerde J, Koen S, Williams EL. The importance of extended leak-off test data for combatting lost circulation. SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics Conference, OnePetro; 2002. https://doi.org/10.2118/78219-MS
Tomren PH, lyoho AW, Azar JJ. Experimental study of cuttings transport in directional wells. SPE Drill Eng. 1986; 1:43-56. https://doi.org/10.2118/12123-PA
Bilgesu HI, Mishra N, Ameri S. Understanding the effects of drilling parameters on hole cleaning in horizontal and deviated wellbores using computational fluid dynamics. Eastern Regional Meeting, Lexington: OnePetro; 2007. https://doi.org/10.2118/111208-MS
Bizhani M., Rodriguez Corredor FE, Kuru E. Quantitative evaluation of critical conditions required for effective Hole Cleaning in Coiled-Tubing Drilling of Horizontal Wells. SPE Drill Complet. 2016; 31:188-99. https://doi.org/10.2118/174404-PA
al Rubaii MM. A new robust approach for hole cleaning to improve rate of penetration. SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition, Dammam: SPE; 2018. https://doi.org/10.2118/192223-MS
Sun K, Wu L, Bui N, Samuel R. Leak off test LOT modeling for inclined and horizontal wells. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio: OnePetro; 2017. https://doi.org/10.2118/187326-MS
Bauer A, Larsen I, Lavrov A. Numerical model of extended leak-off test (XLOT). 49th US Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium, OnePetro; 2015, vol. 1, p. 1359-68.
Lavrov A, Larsen I, Bauer A. Numerical modelling of extended leak-off test with a pre-existing fracture. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 2016; 49: 1359-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0807-x
Altun G, Langlinais J, Bourgoyne AT. Application of a new model to analyze leak-off tests. SPE Drill & Complet. 2001; 16: 108-16. https://doi.org/10.2118/72061-PA
Paknejad A, Schubert J, Amani M. A New method to evaluate leak-off tests in shallow marine aediments (SMS). SPE Saudi Arabia Section Technical Symposium, Dhahran: OnePetro; 2007. https://doi.org/10.2118/110953-MS
Ju Y, Wang Y, Chen J, Gao F, Wang J. Adaptive finite element-discrete element method for numerical analysis of the multistage hydrofracturing of horizontal wells in tight reservoirs considering pre-existing fractures, hydromechanical coupling, and leak-off effects. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2018; 54: 266-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2018.04.015
Altun G. Analysis of non-linear formation fracture resistance tests obtained during oil well drilling operations (Thesis). Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College; 1999.
Sanaee R, Reza Shadizadeh S, Ali Riahi M. Determination of the stress profile in a deep borehole in a naturally fractured reservoir. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 2010; 47: 599-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.03.014
Haimson B, Lin W, Oku H, Hung J-H, Song S-R. Integrating borehole-breakout dimensions, strength criteria, and leak-off test results, to constrain the state of stress across the Chelungpu Fault, Taiwan. Tectonophysics 2010; 482: 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.05.016
Lin W, Yamamoto K, Ito H, Masago H, Kawamura Y. Estimation of minimum principal stress from an extended leak-off test onboard the Chikyu drilling vessel and suggestions for future test procedures. Scientific Drilling 2008; 6: 43-7. https://doi.org/10.5194/sd-6-43-2008
Li G, Lorwongngam A, Roegiers JC. Critical review of leak-off test as a practice for determination of in-situ stresses. 43rd U.S. Rock Mechanics Symposium and 4th U.S.-Canada Rock Mechanics Symposium, OnePetro; 2009.
Zhang S, Yin S, Wang F, Zhao H. Characterization of in situ stress state and joint properties from extended leak-off tests in fractured reservoirs. Int J Geomech. 2017; 17(3): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000757
White AJ, Traugott MO, Swarbrick RE. The use of leak-off tests as means of predicting minimum in-situ stress. Pet Geosci. 2002; 8: 189-93. https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo.8.2.189
van-der-Zee W, Ozan C, Brudy M, Holland M. 3D geomechanical modeling of complex salt structures. SIMULIA Customer Conference, 2011, p. 1-17.
Seyedsajadi S, Aghighi MA. Construction and analysis of a geomechanical model for bangestan reservoir in koopal field. Iran J Min Eng. 2015; 10: 21-34.
Pandey RA, Singh TN. A critical assessment of Geomechanics of leak off test. Int J Earth Sci Eng. 2016; 9: 1393-6.
Cottrell MG, Hartley LJ, Libby S. Advances in hydromechanical coupling for complex hydraulically fractured unconventional reservoirs. 53rd U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, OnePetro; 2019.
Sarmadivaleh M, Rasouli V. Simulation of hydraulic fracturing in tight formations. APPEA J. 2010; 50: 581-92. https://doi.org/10.1071/AJ09035
Abell BC, Xing P, Bunger A, Dontsov E, Suarez-Rivera R. Laboratory investigation of leak-off during hydraulic fracturing into bedding interfaces. SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Tulsa, OK, USA: OnePetro; 2019. https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2019-900
Penny GS, Conway MW, Lee W. Control and modeling of fluid leakoff during hydraulic fracturing. J Pet Technol. 1985; 37: 1071-81. https://doi.org/10.2118/12486-PA
Pan P-Z, Wu Z-H, Yan F, Ji W-W, Miao S-T, Wang Z. Effect of the intermediate principal stress on hydraulic fracturing in granite: an experimental study. Environ Earth Sci. 2020; 79: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8760-8
Gholami R, Rabiei M, Rasouli V, Aadnoy B, Fakhari N. Application of quantitative risk assessment in wellbore stability analysis. J Pet Sci Eng. 2015; 135: 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.09.013
Zhang L, Cao P, Radha KC. Evaluation of rock strength criteria for wellbore stability analysis. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 2010; 47: 1304-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.09.001
Wang H, Soliman MY, Shan Z, Meng F, Towler BF. Understanding the effects of leakoff tests on wellbore strength. SPE Drill Compet. 2011; 26: 531-9. https://doi.org/10.2118/132981-PA
Asadi MSS, Khaksar A, White A, Yao Z. Wellbore stability analysis in depleted deep-water reservoirs: a case study from Australia. SPE Middle East Oil & Gas Show and Conference, 8-11th of March, Manama: OnePetro; 2015. https://doi.org/10.2118/172685-MS
Dutta DJ, Farouk M. Wellbore stability and trajectory sensitivity analyses help safe drilling of the first horizontal well in asl formation, gulf of suez, Egypt. IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, 25-27th of August, Jakarta: OnePetro; 2008. https://doi.org/10.2118/114670-MS
van Steene M, Povstyanova M, Al-Attar H, el Gheit DA, Abutaleb M, Lantz J, et al. Using wellbore stability analysis to improve drilling performance: case study from the western desert, Egypt. North Africa Technical Conference and Exhibition, 14-17th of February, Cairo: OnePetro; 2010. https://doi.org/10.2118/128112-MS
Desroches J, Woods TE. Stress measurements for sand control. SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics in Petroleum Engineering, 8-10th of July, Trondheim: OnePetro; 1998. https://doi.org/10.2118/47247-MS
Dawood JK. Investigation of wellbore stability in a horizontal well drilled in interbedded sandstone reservoir of Zubair field (Thesis). Politecnico di Torino University; 2020.
Zhang Y, Yin S, Zhang J. In situ stress prediction in subsurface rocks: an overview and a new method. Geofluids 2021; 2021: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6639793
Altun G, Langlinais J, Bourgoyne AT. New model to analyze non-linear leak-off test behavior. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 3-6th of October, Houston, Texas: OnePetro; 1999. https://doi.org/10.2118/56761-MS
Zhou D, Wojtanowicz AK. Analysis of leak-off tests in shallow marine sediments. J Energy Resour Technol. 2002; 124: 231-8. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1506322
Gandomkar A, Fu J, Gray KE. Leak-off test model combining wellbore and near-wellbore mechanical behavior. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston: OnePetro; 2015. https://doi.org/10.2118/174876-MS
Feng Y, Gray KE. A comparison study of extended leak-off tests in permeable and impermeable formations. 50th US Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium 2016, vol. 2, OnePetro; 2016.
Eide VV. Numerical simulation of extended leak-off tests. Master Thesis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology; June 2014.
Phusing D, Suzuki K, Zaman M. Mechanical behavior of granular materials under continuously varying b values using DEM. Int J Geomech. 2016; 16: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000506
Murgas JFC. Numerical modelling of leak off test in oil wells 2012 (Thesis). University of Rio de Janeiro, 2012.
Islam MA, Helstrup OA, Skadsem HJ. Method and apparatus for automated pressure integrity testing (APIT). Google Patents NO20181062A1, 2021.
Islam MA, Helstrup OA, Moi S, Carlsen LA. Automated pressure integrity testing APIT-A step change approach. Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, 7-10th of November, Abu Dhabi: OnePetro; 2016. https://doi.org/10.2118/183273-MS
Ravi K, Weber L. Drill-cutting removal in a horizontal wellbore for cementing. IADC/SPE drilling conference, New Orleans: SPE; 1996. https://doi.org/10.2118/35081-MS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Elham Bakhshi, Behzad Elahifar, Abbas Shahrabadi, Naser Golsanami , Reza Khajenaeini