Estimation of Wind Effects on High-Rise Structures by the Global Load Effects and Database-Assisted Design Methods
Abstract - 239
PDF

Keywords

Risk assessment
Wind engineering
High-rise buildings
Global load effects
Property insurance
Structural engineering
Database-assisted design
Demand-to-capacity indexes

Categories

How to Cite

1.
Simiu E. Estimation of Wind Effects on High-Rise Structures by the Global Load Effects and Database-Assisted Design Methods. Int. J. Archit. Eng. Technol. [Internet]. 2025 May 5 [cited 2025 May 19];12:1-7. Available from: https://avantipublishers.com/index.php/ijaet/article/view/1597

Abstract

Structural wind effects on high-rise buildings subjected to extreme directional winds can be determined by one of three methods: (i) HFB (high frequency balance), used only for buildings with very complex shapes or with many fine-scale features, (ii) GLE (global load effects), commonly used in current commercial wind engineering laboratory practice, and (iii) the DAD (Database Assisted Design) method. The purpose of this paper is to consider the advantages and drawbacks of the GLE and DAD methods, both of which use the multi-channel pressure scanning system. Following these methods’ brief description, it is noted that the GLE method has over DAD the advantage of significantly lower computational time requirements. This is shown to be due to GLE’s basic assumption that the peak Demand-to-Capacity Indexes (DCIs) of all the building’s structural members occur at the same time. It is then shown that this assumption is incorrect, and that it results in the GLE method’s underestimation of all the structural members’ DCIs, inter-story drift ratios, and top floor accelerations. In contrast, the DAD method is shown to satisfy all applicable strength and serviceability performance criteria. However, the computational resources required for DAD’s use exceed the resources typically available to small or mid-sized structural design offices. Recent research results concerning the DAD method are then noted, and various approaches are proposed to the reduction of the DAD method’s computation time requirements by up to two orders of magnitude.

https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9821.2025.12.1
PDF

References

Irwin PA, Denoon R, Scott D. Wind tunnel testing of high-rise buildings. Abingdon: Routledge; 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315879529

Boggs D, Lepage A. Wind tunnel methods. 2008. Available from: https://cppwind.com (accessed on 15 April 2025).

American Society of Civil Engineers. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures (ASCE 7-22). Reston (VA): ASCE; 2022.

Merhi A, Letchford CW. Computational method in database-assisted design for wind engineering with varying performance objectives. Wind Struct. 2021; 32(5): 439-52.

Park S, Yeo D. Introductory tutorial for DAD: design examples of high-rise buildings for wind. NIST Tech Note 2001. Gaithersburg (MD): NIST; 2018. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.TN.2001

Rhee D, Yeo D, Mashnad M, Carman B, Clay C. Database-assisted design approach for dynamically sensitive steel and reinforced concrete structures. NIST Tech Note 2308. 2024. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.TN.2308

Saini D, Alipour A, Shafei B. Database-assisted design of high-rise steel structures using ETABS software. User's Manual, DAD-ETABS version 1. 2022. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.GCR.22-035

Saini D, Dokhaei B, Shafei B, Alipour A. Performance evaluation of high-rise buildings using the database-assisted design approach. Struct Saf. 2024; (in press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2024.102447

Saini D, Heckert NA, Simiu E. N-year demand-to-capacity indexes and the design of high-rise buildings for wind. Structures. 2024; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106488

Simiu E, Yeo D. Wind effects on structures. 4th ed. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119375890

Mohammadi A, Azizinamini A, Griffis A, Irwin P. Performance assessment of an existing 47-story high-rise building under extreme wind loads. J Struct Eng. 2019; 145(1): 04018232-1. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002239

American Institute for Steel Construction. Specifications for structural steel buildings AISC 360-10. Chicago (IL): AISC; 2010.

Isyumov N, Ho E, Case P. Influence of wind directionality on wind loads and responses. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod. 2014; 114: 169-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.06.006

Davenport AG. Note on the distribution of the largest value of a random function with application to gust loading. Proc Inst Civ Eng. 1964; 28(2): 187-96. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1964.10112

Preumont A. On the peak factor of stationary Gaussian processes. J Sound Vib. 1985; 100: 15-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(85)90339-6

Yeo D. Multiple points-in-time estimation of peak wind effects on structures. J Struct Eng. 2013; 139(3): 462-71. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000649

Biswas P, Peronto J, editors. Design and performance of tall buildings for wind. ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 143. Reston (VA): ASCE; 2020. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784415658

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Emil Simiu

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.