Abstract
This research integrates theory with practice (thought and action) connecting real-life problems to theorical foundations, with the dual aim of solving a design problem in the circular economy (CE) and delivering new knowledge through experimentation. This paper stems from the observation that architects commonly rely on their personal experience while designing without adopting structured frameworks. The present study aims at validating a previously proposed circular design methodological framework in practice. To achieve this aim, the research employed a design workshop to test this design methodology. This is followed by an analysis of how non-expert architects in CE perceived and applied it. The study recorded participants’ interaction with the gamification sense implied in the methodology and assessed their ability to develop designs compatible with CE principles. Data collection included sketches, video recordings, observations, and written notes. The findings highlight the potential of the circular design methodology to support the design process in CE. Participants reported positive experiences, describing the methodology as flexible, easy to comprehend, enjoyable, time-efficient, and educational. The results validate the applicability of this circular design methodology, leading to setting a step-by-step guideline for its future implementation. Ultimately, the validation of this design methodology may promote wider dissemination and acceleration of the culture of circular design in architectural practices, even for non-expert architects in CE.
References
Mhatre P, Gedam V, Unnikrishnan S, Verma S. Circular economy in built environment - Literature review and theory development. J Build Eng. 2021; 35: 101995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101995
Dongez N, Manisa K, Basdogan S. Tendency to Circular Economy: Reuse of Architectural Elements. 2022. Available from: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:247314203 (accessed on September 2025).
Rao PA, Rahman MM, Duraman SB. Adopting circular economy in construction: a review. Front Built Environ. 2025; 11: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2025.1519219
Bamidele T. Circular Economy for the Built Environment: Reconciling the Actions and Intentions of Building Professionals in Africa and the Global West. In: ACSA 110 Annual Meeting. Los Angeles, CA: 2022. Available from: https://www.acsa-arch.org/proceedings/Annual%20Meeting%20Proceedings/ACSA.AM.110/ACSA.AM.110.51.pdf
Dokter G, Thuvander L, Rahe U. How circular is current design practice? Investigating perspectives across industrial design and architecture in the transition towards a circular economy. Sustain Prod Consum. 2021; 26: 692-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.032
Charef R, Lu W, Hall D. The transition to the circular economy of the construction industry: Insights into sustainable approaches to improve the understanding. J Clean Prod. 2022; 364: 132421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132421
Cruz Rios F, Grau D. Circular Economy in the Built Environment: Designing, Deconstructing, and Leasing Reusable Products. In: Hashmi S, Ed. Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering. Arizona, US: Elsevier; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.11494-8
Bhandari A. Circular Economy, Building Materials and Methods. Proc CATE 2023; pp. 159-78. Available from: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:269734376
Cohen J, Dokter G, Hagejärd S, Rexfelt O, Thuvander L. Mapping the practice of circular design: a survey study with industrial designers and architects in the Netherlands and Sweden. J Des. Res. 2024; 21: 177-209. https://doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2024.143685
Knošková Ľ. Circular design and consumer involvement in circular economy. Stud Commer Bratisl. 2020; 13(43): 25-34. https://doi.org/10.2478/stcb-2020-0001
Çetin S, De Wolf C, Bocken N. Circular Digital Built Environment: An Emerging Framework. Sustainability. 2021; 13(11): 1-36. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116348
Abdulai SF, Nani G, Taiwo R, Antwi-Afari P, Zayed T, Sojobi AO. Modelling the relationship between circular economy barriers and drivers for sustainable construction industry. Build Environ. 2024; 254: 111388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111388
Finamore M, Oltean-Dumbrava C. Circular economy in construction - findings from a literature review. Heliyon. 2024; 10(15): e34647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34647
van Laar B, Greco A, Remøy H, Gruis V, Hamida MB. Towards desirable futures for the circular adaptive reuse of buildings: A participatory approach. Sustain Cities Soc. 2025; 122: 106259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.106259
Kaya FE, Monsù Scolaro A. Circularity as a climate change mitigation strategy in the building sector: the stakeholder's involvement in the interconnected life cycle phases. Sustainability. 2023; 15(9): 7554. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097554
Timm JFG, Maciel VG, Passuello A. Towards Sustainable Construction: A Systematic Review of Circular Economy Strategies and Ecodesign in the Built Environment. Buildings. 2023; 13(8): 2059. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13082059
Sharmina M, Pappas D, Scott K, Gallego-Schmid A. Impact of Circular Economy Measures in the European Union Built Environment on a Net-Zero Target. Circ Econ Sustain. 2023; 3(4): 1989-2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-023-00257-2
Yang M, Chen L, Wang J, Msigwa G, Osman AI, Fawzy S, et al. Circular economy strategies for combating climate change and other environmental issues. Environ Chem Lett. 2023; 21(1): 55-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01499-6
Daly P, Barril PG. Biobased Construction from Agricultural Crops: Paper 1 - A State of Play of Commercial Solutions in Europe. Int J Archit Eng Technol. 2024; 11: 17-35. https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9821.2024.11.2
Wang K, Costanzavan den Belt M, Heath G, Walzberg J, Curtis T, Barrie J, et al. Circular Economy as a Climate Strategy: Current Knowledge and Calls-to-Action. Washington, DC: 2022. https://doi.org/10.2172/1897625
Kamel AA, Alamoudy FO, Othman AAE. Circular Economy for Minimising Waste Generation During the Architectural Design Process. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2024; 1396(1): 12015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1396/1/012015
Eberhardt LCM, Birkved M, Birgisdottir H. Building design and construction strategies for a circular economy. Archit Eng Des Manag. 2020; 18(2): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2020.1781588
Gallego-Schmid A, Chen H, Sharmina M, Mendoza JMF. Links between circular economy and climate change mitigation in the built environment. J Clean Prod. 2020; 260: 121115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121115
Itanola M, Griffiths P, Motawa I. Closing the loop in building services: A systematic review of circular economy applications. Build Serv Eng Res Technol. 2025; 46(3): 293-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/01436244241296762
Lucas AN, Löschke SK. Towards circular renovation: a comparative review of circular economy integration in sustainable building rating systems. Build Res Inf. 2025; 53(3): 375-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2024.2394470
AlJaber A, Martinez-Vazquez P, Baniotopoulos C. Exploring circular economy strategies in buildings: evaluating feasibility, stakeholders influence, and the role of the building lifecycle in effective adoption. Appl Sci. 2025; 15(3): 1174. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031174
Akhimien NG, Al AA, Hou SS. Circular Economy in Buildings. In: Zhang T, editor. The Circular Economy - Recent Advances in Sustainable Waste Management. China: IntechOpen; 2022. Available from: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:263740374
The World Bank. COVID-19 to Plunge Global Economy into Worst Recession since World War II. World Bank Gr. 2020. Available from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2020/06/08/covid-19-to-plunge-global-economy-into-worst-recession-since-world-war-ii (Access on July 15, 2020).
Livina A, Veliverronenalv L. Application of Circular Economy in Shrinking Regions. In: Environment. Technology. Resources. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. Rezekne, Latvia: 2019. p. 147-153. https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2019vol1.4196
Arab Development Portal. The National Agenda for Sustainable Development Egypt's Updated Vision 2030. Cairo, Egypt: 2023. Available from: https://mped.gov.eg/Files/Egypt_Vision_2030_EnglishDigitalUse.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Amarasinghe I, Hong Y, Stewart RA. Development of a material circularity evaluation framework for building construction projects. J Clean Prod. 2024; 436: 140562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140562
Othman AAE, Kamel AA, Alamoudy FO. A circular economy framework for reducing construction waste during the design process in Egyptian architectural design firms. Constr Innov. 2025; (epub ahead). https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-08-2024-0236
Dabaieh M, Maguid D, El-Mahdy D. Circularity in the New Gravity-Re-Thinking Vernacular Architecture and Circularity. Sustainability. 2022; 14(1): 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010328
Othman AAE, Saad ASM. A strategy for reducing construction waste generated during the design process in architectural design firms in Egypt. Constr Innov. 2024; (epub ahead). https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-08-2023-0202
KhairEldin M, Daoud AO, Ibrahim AH, Toma HM. Predicting construction waste in Egyptian residential projects: a robust multiple regression model approach. Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1): 2972. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86474-1
The Ministry of Environment. State of the Environment 2017 Arab Republic of Egypt: Summary for Policymakers. 2018. Available from: http://www.eeaa.gov.eg/portals/0/eeaaReports/SoE-2017/Egypt SOE 2017 - SPM English.pdf (Accessed on April 7, 2021).
Bilal M, Khan KIA, Thaheem MJ, Nasir AR. Current state and barriers to the circular economy in the building sector: Towards a mitigation framework. J Clean Prod. 2020; 276: 123250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123250
Gericke K, Eckert C, Stacey M. Elements of a design method - a basis for describing and evaluating design methods. Des Sci. 2022; 8: e29. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2022.23
Cash P, Daalhuizen J, Hekkert P. Evaluating the efficacy and effectiveness of design methods: A systematic review and assessment framework. Des Stud. 2023; 88: 101204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2023.101204
Patricio R, Tsvetcoff R, Passadouro M, Duarte N. Developing design thinking skills and engagement through gamification. In: 31st Innovation and Product Development Management Conference. Dublin, Ireland: 2024.
El Mehelmy D, El Zeini I. Experiential learning through gamification in interior architecture and design. Int J Archit Arts Appl. 2024; 10(2): 42-59. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20241002.13
Ehab A, Burnett G, Heath T. Enhancing public engagement in architectural design: a comparative analysis of advanced virtual reality approaches in building information modeling and gamification techniques. Buildings. 2023; 13(5): 1-28. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051262
Bhatt A, Chakrabarti A. Gamification of design thinking: a way to enhance effectiveness of learning. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf. 2022; 36(e29): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060422000154
Patricio R, Moreira A, Zurlo F. Enhancing design thinking approaches to innovation through gamification. Eur J Innov Manag. 2021; 24(5): 1569-94. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-06-2020-0239
Ramadan MMA, Gabr AH. Incorporating circular economy in the architectural design process: design methodology using gamification tools. Archnet-IJAR Int J Archit Res 2024; (epub ahead). https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-08-2024-0349
Cambier C, Galle W, De Temmerman N. Research and development directions for design support tools for circular building. Buildings. 2020; 10(8): 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10080142
Islamoglu Ö. Interaction of Concept and Design. Int J Archit Eng Technol. 2017; 4(SE-Articles): 66-71. https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9821.2017.04.9
Abdelmonem MG. Transcending boundaries of creativity: active learning in the design studio. Int J Archit Eng Technol. 2014; 1(1): 38-49. https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9821.2014.01.01.5
Orhan M. The Role and Importance of Workshops in the Architectural Design Education; Case of "Self Made Architecture İ-İI". In: New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences. 2017. p. 131-6. https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v3i3.1545
Dawar El Ezba Cultural Center / Ahmed Hossam Saafan. Archdaily. 2020. Available from: https://www.archdaily.com/934818/dawar-el-ezba-cultural-center-ahmed-hossam-saafan (Accessed on April 7, 2021).
Macmillan S, Steele J, Kirby P, Spence R, Austin S. Mapping the design process during the conceptual phase of building projects. Eng Constr Archit Manag. 2002; 9(3): 174-80. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb021213

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Menatalla M.A.M. Ramadan, Aly H. Gabr