Seismic Strengthening of RC Exterior Beam-Column Joints Using Local Confinement and 45° Steel Haunches: A Comparative FE Study

Authors

  • Guillaume Poh’sie College of Technology, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon
  • William Dapeuh Department of Civil Engineering, National Advanced School of Public Works, Yaoundé, Cameroon
  • Styve Ntakam Department of Civil Engineering, National Advanced School of Public Works, Yaoundé, Cameroon
  • Jordan Defo Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
  • Maël Sonna Department of Civil and Urban Engineering, National Institute of Applied Sciences of Rennes, Rennes, France https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7169-6194
  • Emanuele Maiorana Department of Economics, Science, Engineering and Design, University of the Republic of San Marino, San Marino, San Marino https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3574-1410

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9821.2026.13.6

Keywords:

Joint confinement, Steel haunch retrofit, Seismic strengthening, RC beam-column joint, Finite element modelling (ABAQUS).

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of local confinement and the introduction of metallic haunches on the mechanical and seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete beam–column joints. A numerical comparative approach is adopted to assess the performance of several strengthening configurations relative to a reference unstrengthen joint. Three confinement configurations are examined notably the confinement of the column in the joint region, confinement of the beam, and simultaneous confinement of both the beam and the column. A fourth configuration incorporates two metallic haunches inclined at 45°, acting as an external strengthening system applied to the unconfined reference configuration. The results indicate that confinement generally enhances the strength, ductility, and energy dissipation capacity of beam-column joints under seismic loading. Among the confined configurations, simultaneous confinement of the beam and the column provides the best overall performance. This is followed by confinement of the column alone, while confinement of the beam alone exhibits comparable load-bearing capacity but slightly inferior performance due to less favourable failure mechanisms. In contrast, the introduction of metallic haunches inclined at 45° leads to a very significant increase in mechanical and seismic performance, clearly exceeding the improvements achieved through conventional confinement. These findings highlight the critical role of external strengthening devices in enhancing the seismic behaviour of beam–column joints and emphasize the strong potential of metallic haunches for the seismic design and retrofitting of reinforced concrete structures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Park R, Paulay T. Reinforced concrete structures. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1975. http://doi.org/10.1002/9780470172834

[2] Beres A, El-Borgi S, White RN, Gergely P. Experimental results of repaired and retrofitted beam-column joint tests in lightly reinforced concrete frame buildings. Technical Report NCEER-92-0025. SUNY/Buffalo; 1992.

[3] Joint ACI-ASCE Committee 352. Recommendations for design of beam-column connections in monolithic reinforced concrete structures (ACI 352R-02). Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute; 2002.

[4] Karayannis CG, Chalioris CE, Sideris KK. Effectiveness of RC beam-column connection repair using epoxy resin injections. J Earthq Eng. 1998; 2(2): 217-40. http://doi.org/10.1080/13632469809350320

[5] Tsonos AG. Seismic rehabilitation of reinforced concrete joints by the removal and replacement technique. Eur Earthq Eng. 2001; (3): 29-43.

[6] Bindhu KR, Mohana N, Sivakumar S. New reinforcement detailing for concrete jacketing of non-ductile exterior beam-column joints. J Perform Constr Facil. 2014; 30(1): 04014192. http://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000700

[7] Shafaei J, Hosseini A, Marefat MS. Seismic retrofit of external RC beam-column joints by joint enlargement using prestressed steel angles. Eng Struct. 2014; 81: 265-88. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.10.006

[8] Wu JR, Liu Y. Seismic behavior of RC beam-column joints retrofitted by steel angles and prestressed strands. Eng Struct. 2019; 198: 109539.

[9] Khalafudin M, Qomariyah S. Retrofit of exterior reinforced concrete beam-column joint using pre-tensioned stiffened steel angles. Structures. 2022; 46: 1293-312. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.10.034

[10] Biddah A, Ghobarah A, Aziz TS. Upgrading of nonductile reinforced concrete frame connections. J Struct Eng. 1997; 123(8): 1001-10. http://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:8(1001)

[11] Sharbatdar MK, Kheyroddin A, Emami E. Cyclic behavior of retrofitted RC beam-column joints using steel prop. Constr Build Mater. 2012; 36: 287-94. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.115

[12] Sharma A, Genesio G, Reddy GR, Eligehausen R. Experimental investigations on seismic retrofit of RC beam-column joints using fully fastened steel plates. Mater Struct. 2014; 47(3): 393-410.

[13] Corazao M, Durrani AJ. Repair and strengthening of beam-to-column connections subjected to earthquake loading. Technical Report NCEER-89-0013. SUNY/Buffalo; 1989.

[14] Hakuto S, Park R, Tanaka H. Seismic load tests on substandard beam-column joints without transverse reinforcement. ACI Struct J. 2000; 97(1): 11-25. http://doi.org/10.14359/829

[15] Ruiz-Pinilla JG, Pallarés FJ, Gimenez E, Calderón PA. Experimental tests on retrofitted RC beam-column joints under designed to seismic loads: General approach. Eng Struct. 2014; 65: 12-25. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.11.008

[16] Karayannis CG, Golias E. An innovative technique for the strengthening of RC columns and their connections with beams using C-FRP ropes. Appl Sci. 2024; 14(18): 8395. http://doi.org/10.3390/app14188395

[17] Triantafillou TC. Strengthening of structures with advanced FRPs. Prog Struct Eng Mater. 1998; 1(2): 126-34. http://doi.org/10.1002/pse.2260010204

[18] El-Amoury T, Ghobarah A. Seismic rehabilitation of beam-column joints using GFRP sheets. Eng Struct. 2002; 24(11): 1397-407. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00081-0

[19] Del Vecchio C, Di Ludovico M, Balsamo A, Prota A, Manfredi G, Dolce M. Experimental investigation of exterior RC joints strengthened with FRP systems. J Compos Constr. 2014; 18(4): 04014002. http://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000459

[20] Ghobarah A, Said AM. Seismic rehabilitation of beam-column joints using FRP laminates. J Earthq Eng. 2001; 5(1): 113-29. http://doi.org/10.1080/13632460109350388

[21] Antonopoulos CP, Triantafillou TC. Analysis of FRP strengthened RC beam-column joints. J Compos Constr. 2002; 6(1): 41-51. http://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:1(41)

[22] Seible F, Priestley MJN, Hegemier GA, Innamorato D. Seismic retrofit of RC columns with continuous carbon fiber jackets. J Compos Constr. 1997; 1(2): 52-62. http://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1997)1:2(52)

[23] Abedi K, Afsar Dizaj E. Retrofit of deficient reinforced concrete beam-column joints using steel haunches. J Build Eng. 2020; 32: 101783.

[24] Pampanin S, Christopoulos C, Chen TH. Development and validation of a metallic haunch seismic retrofit solution for existing under-designed RC frame buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2006; 35(14): 1739-66. http://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.600

[25] Tariq M, Bhargava P, Sharma A. Seismic upgrading of RC beam-column joints using fully fastened steel haunches. Structures. 2022; 35: 314-25.

[26] Yen JYR, Chien HK. Steel plates rehabilitated RC beam-column joints subjected to cyclic loading. J Mar Sci Technol. 2010; 18(3): 393-99. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.029

[27] Paul A, Dasgupta K. Post-yield behavior of RC beam-column joints retrofitted using steel plates. J Earthq Eng. 2021; 25(10): 1954-76.

[28] Torabi A, Maheri MR. Seismic repair and retrofit of RC beam-column joints using stiffened steel plates. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng. 2016; 40(2): 123-34. http://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-016-0034-z

[29] Subramanian N, Velmurugan V. Experimental investigation on seismic performance of external RC beam-column joints retrofitted using externally bonded steel angles. Constr Build Mater. 2018; 178: 301-14.

[30] Hadi MNS, Tran TM. Retrofitting nonseismically detailed exterior beam-column joints using concrete covers and steel plates. J Struct Eng. 2014; 140(2): 04013054. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.019

[31] Li B, Chua HYG. Seismic performance of deficient reinforced concrete intersecting beam-column joints retrofitted with external steel elements. J Struct Eng. 2009; 135(11): 1353-63. http://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:10(1177)

[32] Pampanin S, Bolognini D, Pavese A. Performance-based seismic retrofit strategy for existing reinforced concrete frame systems using fiber-reinforced polymer composites. J Compos Constr. 2007; 11(2): 211-26. http://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:2(211)

[33] Garcia R, Hajirasouliha I, Pilakoutas K. Seismic behaviour of deficient RC frames strengthened with CFRP composite. Eng Struct. 2010; 32(10): 3075-85. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.05.026

[34] Campione G, Cavaleri L, Papia M. Flexural response of external R.C. beam-column joints externally strengthened with steel cages. Eng Struct. 2015; 104: 51-64. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.009

[35] Santarsiero G, Masi A. Seismic upgrading of RC wide beam-column joints using steel jackets. Buildings. 2020; 10(11): 203. http://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10110203

[36] Ghobarah A, Aziz TS, Biddah A. Rehabilitation of reinforced concrete frame connections using corrugated steel jacketing. ACI Struct J. 1997; 94(3): 283-94. http://doi.org/10.14359/480

[37] Beres A, Pessiki SP, White RN, Gergely P. Implications of experiments on the seismic behavior of gravity load designed RC beam-to-column connections. Earthq Spectra. 1996; 12(2): 185-98. http://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585876

[38] Zhang D, Zhang L, Gao Y, Wang X, Wang Y, Deng C. Seismic retrofit of fabricated steel exterior beam-to-column connections using knee braces. Structures. 2024; 69: 107409. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107409

[39] Zhang D, Zhang L, Gao Y, Wang X, Wang Y. Development and validation of external steel joints retrofitted by knee braces. Constr Build Mater. 2025; 491: 142609. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.142609

[40] Jones SL, Fry GT, Engelhardt MD. Experimental evaluation of cyclically loaded reduced beam section moment connections. J Struct Eng. 2002; 128(4): 441-51. http://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(441)

[41] Sahil M, Bahrami A, Waqas HA, Amin F, Khan MM, Iqbal F, et al. Seismic performance evaluation of exterior reinforced concrete beam-column connections retrofitted with economical perforated steel haunches. Results Eng. 2024; 22: 102179. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102179

[42] Engindeniz M, Kahn LF, Zureick AH. Repair and strengthening of RC beam-column joints: State of the art. ACI Struct J. 2005; 102(2): 187-96. http://doi.org/10.14359/14269

[43] Arzeytoon A, Hosseini A, Goudarzi A. Seismic rehabilitation of exterior RC beam-column joints using steel plates, angles, and posttensioning rods. J Perform Constr Facil. 2016; 30(1): 04015021. http://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000721

[44] Hung CC, Hsiao HJ, Shao Y, Yen CH. A comparative study on the seismic performance of RC beam-column joints retrofitted by ECC, FRP, and concrete jacketing methods. J Build Eng. 2022; 64: 105691. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105691

[45] Golias E. Strengthening of reinforced concrete beam-column joints by means of fastened C-FRP ropes. Structures. 2024; 66: 106811. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106811

[46] Genesio G. Seismic assessment of RC exterior beam-column joints and retrofit with haunches using post-installed anchors [doctoral dissertation]. Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart; 2012.

[47] Genesio G, Sharma A, Eligehausen R, Pampanin S, Reddy GR. Development of seismic retrofit technique of RC frame using fully fastened haunch elements: static to dynamic testing. In: 14th symposium on earthquake engineering; 2010; IIT Roorkee, India.

[48] Genesio G, Eligehausen R, Pampanin S. Application of post-installed anchors for seismic retrofit of RC joints. In: Proceedings of the Pacific conference on earthquake engineering (PCEE 2011); 2011; Auckland, New Zealand.

[49] Marchisella A, Muciaccia G, Sharma A, Eligehausen R. Experimental investigation of 3D RC exterior joint retrofitted with fully-fastened haunch retrofit solution. Eng Struct. 2021; 239: 112206. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112206

[50] Helal Y, Garcia R, Guadagnini M, Hajirasouliha I. Strengthening of short splices in RC beams using post-tensioned metal straps. Mater Struct. 2016; 49(7): 2789-803. http://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0481-6

[51] Dassault Systèmes. Abaqus analysis user's manual (version 2024). Providence, RI: Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp; 2024.

[52] Poh'sié GH. Analisi della capacità portante a taglio delle travi in calcestruzzo armato [master's thesis]. Trieste: Università degli Studi di Trieste; 2011.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-20

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories

How to Cite

1.
Seismic Strengthening of RC Exterior Beam-Column Joints Using Local Confinement and 45° Steel Haunches: A Comparative FE Study. Int. J. Archit. Eng. Technol. [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 20 [cited 2026 Apr. 20];13(1):99-115. Available from: https://avantipublishers.com/index.php/ijaet/article/view/1774

Similar Articles

21-30 of 50

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)