A Pilot Study of a Hybrid Process Involving In Situ Regenerated Activated Carbon, Membrane Separation and Advanced Oxidation for Water Pollution Abatement

Authors

  • Vasilis C. Sarasidis Centre for Research and Technology – Hellas (CERTH), P.O. Box 60361, 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Road, Thermi, Thessaloniki, GR 57001, Greece https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9560-2615
  • Konstantinos V. Plakas Centre for Research and Technology – Hellas (CERTH), P.O. Box 60361, 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Road, Thermi, Thessaloniki, GR 57001, Greece https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9865-7956
  • Anastasios J. Karabelas Centre for Research and Technology – Hellas (CERTH), P.O. Box 60361, 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Road, Thermi, Thessaloniki, GR 57001, Greece https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1463-519X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-983X.2021.08.5

Keywords:

Water purification, (Photo)-Fenton oxidation, Powdered activated carbon, Hydrogen peroxide photolysis, Ultrafiltration, in situ regeneration

Abstract

The assessment of a pilot-scale hybrid system coupling powdered activated carbon (PAC) adsorption with membrane ultrafiltration (UF), in respect of activated carbon regeneration and organic micropollutant removal, was investigated in this study. Field tests with two adsorbents (i.e. a commercial PAC and a PAC-Fe(II) composite), conducted in the premises of Thessaloniki Water Treatment Plant, demonstrated the high efficiency of the combined PAC/UF process. Regeneration efficiencies varying between approximately 95% and 110%, complete diclofenac (DCF) degradation and rather moderate mineralization (TOC removal) rates of up to 47%, can be achieved by UVC/H2O2 or photo-Fenton oxidation after 4 hours of treatment; this performance is attributed to the in situ generation of reactive oxidant species by photolysis of H2O2, which seems to enhance the process effectiveness. Among the two adsorbent materials tested, composite PAC-Fe(II) exhibited a higher DCF adsorption capacity than the original PAC, probably due to the improved chemisorption and/or the electrostatic attractive interactions between the negatively charged DCF molecules and the positively charged iron species, at neutral pH. Furthermore, a rather insignificant effect of PAC-Fe(II) loading on the regeneration efficiency was observed. The advantages of totally controlled H2O2 dosages and short operating times render the hybrid PAC/UF system a promising alternative to conventional and advanced drinking water purification methods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Vasilis C. Sarasidis, Centre for Research and Technology – Hellas (CERTH), P.O. Box 60361, 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Road, Thermi, Thessaloniki, GR 57001, Greece

    Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute (CPERI)

  • Konstantinos V. Plakas, Centre for Research and Technology – Hellas (CERTH), P.O. Box 60361, 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Road, Thermi, Thessaloniki, GR 57001, Greece

    Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute (CPERI)

  • Anastasios J. Karabelas, Centre for Research and Technology – Hellas (CERTH), P.O. Box 60361, 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Road, Thermi, Thessaloniki, GR 57001, Greece

    Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute (CPERI)

References

Tsaridou C, Karabelas AJ. Drinking water standards and their implementation – A critical assessment. Water 2021; 13: 2918. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13202918 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w13202918

Jiang J-Q, Zhou Z, Sharma VK. Occurrence, transportation, monitoring and treatment of emerging micro-pollutants in waste water – A review from global views. Microchem. J. 2013; 110: 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2013.04.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2013.04.014

Xue P, Zhao Y, Zhao D, Chi M, Yin Y, Xuan Y, et al. Mutagenicity, health risk, and disease burden of exposure to organic micropollutants in water from a drinking water treatment plant in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021; 221: 112421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112421 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112421

Li X, Zhang R, Tian T, Shang X, Du X, He Y, et al. Screening and ecological risk of 1200 organic micropollutants in Yangtze Estuary water. Water Res. 2021; 201: 117341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117341

Plakas KV, Karabelas AJ. Removal of pesticides from water by NF and RO membranes – A review. Desalination 2012; 287: 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.003

Wang S, Li L, Yu S, Dong B, Gao N, Wang X. A review of advances in EDCs and PhACs removal by nanofiltration: Mechanisms, impact factors and the influence of organic matter. Chem. Eng. J. 2021; 406: 126722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126722 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126722

Stoquart C, Pierre Servais P, Bérubéc PR, Barbeau B. Hybrid Membrane Processes using activated carbon treatment for drinking water: A review. J. Memb. Sci. 2012; 411– 412: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.04.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.04.012

Löwenberg J, Zenker A, Baggenstos M, Koch G, Kazner C, Wintgens T. Comparison of two PAC/UF processes for the removal of micropollutants from wastewater treatment plant effluent: Process performance and removal efficiency. Water Res. 2014; 56: 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.02.038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.02.038

Banat F, AI-Bastaki N. Treating dye wastewater by an integrated process of adsorption using activated carbon and ultrafiltration. Desalination 2004; 170: 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2004.02.093 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2004.02.093

Tomaszewska M, Mozia S. Removal of organic matter from water by PAC/UF system. Water Res. 2002; 36: 4137–4143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00122-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00122-7

Ivančev-Tumbas I, Hoffmann G, Hobby R, Kerkez D, Tubić A, Spomenka Babić-Nanić S, et al. Removal of diclofenac from water by in/out PAC/UF hybrid process. Environ. Technol. 2018; 39: 18: 2315-2320. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2017.1354077 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2017.1354077

Cyna B, Chagneau G, Bablon G, Tanghe N. Two years of nanofiltration at the Méry-sur-Oise plant, France. Desalination 2002; 147: 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00578-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00578-7

Laine JM, Vial D, Moulart P. Status after 10 years of operation – overview of UF technology today. Desalination 2000; 131: 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(00)90002-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(00)90002-X

Wang W, Gu P, Zhang G, Wang L. Organics removal from ROC by PAC accumulative countercurrent two-stage adsorption-MF hybrid process – A laboratory-scale study. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013; 118: 342–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.07.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.07.013

Campinas M, Rosa M J. Assessing PAC contribution to the NOM fouling control in PAC/UF systems. Water Res. 2010; 44: 1636–1644.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.11.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.11.012

Taimur Khan M, Takizawa S, Lewandowski Z, Warren L. Jones WL, Camper A.K, et al. Membrane fouling due to dynamic particle size changes in the aerated hybrid PAC–MF system. J. Memb. Sci. 2011; 371: 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.01.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.01.017

Shao S, Cai L, Li K, Li J, Du X, Li G. et al. Deposition of powdered activated carbon (PAC) on ultrafiltration (UF) membrane surface: influencing factors and mechanisms. J. Memb. Sci. 2017; 104-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.02.026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.02.026

Clark M, Baudin I, Anselme C. Membrane-powdered activated carbon reactors. In: Water Treatment-Membrane Processes. AWWARF, Lyonnaise des Eaux and WRCSA (Ed.), Lisbon: McGraw-Hill 1996.

Sarasidis VC, Plakas KV, Karabelas AJ. Novel water-purification hybrid processes involving in situ regenerated activated carbon, membrane separation and advanced oxidation. Chem. Eng. J. 2017; 328: 1153–1163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.084

Horng RS, Tseng IC. Regeneration of granular activated carbon saturated with acetone and isopropyl alcohol via a recirculation process under H2O2/UV oxidation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008; 154: 366–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.033

Santos DSH, Duarte JLS, Josealdo Tonholo J, Lucas Meili L, Carmem L.P.S. Zanta CLPS. Saturated activated carbon regeneration by UV-light, H2O2 and Fenton reaction. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020; 250: 117112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117112

Patel SK, SG, Patel GV. Degradation of Reactive Dye in Aqueous Solution by Fenton, Photo-Fenton Process and Combination Process with Activated Charcoal and TiO2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. A Phys. Sci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-019-00618-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-019-00618-3

Muranaka CT, Julcour C, Wilhelm AM, Delmas H, Nascimento CAO. Regeneration of Activated Carbon by (Photo)-Fenton Oxidation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010; 49: 989-995. DOI: 10.1021/ie900675d DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ie900675d

Plakas KV, Sarasidis VC, Karabelas AJ. A hybrid water purification method based on powdered activated carbon adsorption and in situ regeneration. Hellenic Industrial Property Organization, Number 1009422, Int. Cl: CO2F 1/28, CO2F 1/44, B01D 61/14. 2019

Lapworth DJ, Baran N, Stuart ME, Ward RS. Emerging organic contaminants in groundwater: a review of sources, fate and occurrence. Environ. Pollut. 2012; 163: 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.12.034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.12.034

Plakas KV, Karabelas AJ. A study on heterogeneous Fenton regeneration of powdered activated carbon impregnated with iron oxide nanoparticles. Global NEST Journal 2016; 18(2): 259-268. https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.001894 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.001894

Kaur H, Bansiwal A, Hippargi G, Pophali GR. Effect of hydrophobicity of pharmaceuticals and personal care products for adsorption on activated carbon: Adsorption isotherms, kinetics and mechanism. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018; 25: 20473–20485. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0054-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0054-7

Wang LK, Hung Y, Shammas NK, Advanced Physicochemical Treatment Processes. Handbook of Environmental Engineering, Volume 4. Humana Press. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007; 127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-173-4

Capelli S, Motta D, Evangelisti C, Dimitratos N, Prati L, Pirola C, et al. Effect of Carbon Support, Capping Agent Amount, and Pd NPs Size for Bio-Adipic Acid Production from Muconic Acid and Sodium Muconate. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10: 505: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10030505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10030505

Sarasidis VC, Patsios SI, Karabelas AJ. A hybrid photocatalysis–ultrafiltration continuous process: the case of polysaccharide degradation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011; 80: 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.04.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.04.010

Sarasidis VC, Plakas KV, Patsios SI, Karabelas AJ. Investigation of diclofenac degradation in a continuous photo-catalytic membrane reactor. Influence of operating parameters. Chem. Eng. J. 2014; 239: 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.11.026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.11.026

Patsios SI, Sarasidis VC, Karabelas AJ. A hybrid photocatalysis–ultrafiltration continuous process for humic acids degradation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013; 104: 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.11.033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.11.033

Plakas KV, Sarasidis VC, Patsios SI, Lambropoulou DA, Karabelas AJ. Novel pilot scale continuous photocatalytic membrane reactor for removal of organic micropollutants from water. Chem. Eng. J. 2016; 304: 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.06.075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.06.075

Khataee AR, Safarpour M, Zarei M, Aber S. Electrochemical generation of H2O2 using immobilized carbon nanotubes on graphite electrode fed with air: Investigation of operational parameters. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2011; 659 (1): 63-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2011.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2011.05.002

Özcan A, Şahin Y, Koparal SA, and Oturan MA. Carbon sponge as a new cathode material for the electro-Fenton process: Comparison with carbon felt cathode and application to degradation of synthetic dye basic blue 3 in aqueous medium. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2008; 616: 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2008.01.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2008.01.002

Bañuelos JA, Rodríguez FR, Rocha JM, Bustos E, Rodríguez A, Cruz JC et al. Novel electro-fenton approach for regeneration of activated carbon. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013; 47: 7927−7933. https://doi.org/10.1021/es401320e DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es401320e

Mugisidi D, Ranaldo A, Soedarsono JW, Hikam M. Modification of activated carbon using sodium acetate and its regeneration using sodium hydroxide for the adsorption of copper from aqueous solution. Carbon 2007; 45; 5: 1081-1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2006.12.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2006.12.009

Salvador F, Martin-Sanchez N, Sanchez-Hernandez R, Sanchez-Montero MJ, Izquierdo C. Regeneration of carbonaceous adsorbents. Part II: Chemical, Microbiological and Vacuum Regeneration, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2015; 202: 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2014.08.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2014.08.019

Do MH, Phan NH, Nguyen TD, Suong Pham TT, Nguyen VK, Trang Vu TT et al. Activated carbon/Fe3O4 nanoparticle composite: Fabrication, methyl orange removal and regeneration by hydrogen peroxide. Chemosphere 2011; 85: 1269–1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.07.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.07.023

Rosenfeldt EJ, Linden KG. Degradation of endocrine disrupting chemicals bisphenol A, ethinyl estradiol, and estradiol during UV photolysis and advanced oxidation processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004; 38: 5476-5483. https://doi.org/10.1021/es035413p DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es035413p

Taimur Khan MM, Lewandowski Z, Takizawa S, Yamada K, Katayama H, Yamamoto K, et al. Continuous and efficient removal of THMs from river water using MF membrane combined with high dose of PAC. Desalination 2009; 249: 713–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.09.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.09.009

Zhang Y, Tian J, Nan J, Gao S, Liang H, Wang M, et al. Effect of PAC addition on immersed ultrafiltration for the treatment of algal-rich water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011; 186: 1415–1424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.015

Samir B, Bakhta S, Bouazizi N, Sadaoui Z, Allalou O. Le Derf F et al. TBO Degradation by Heterogeneous Fenton-like Reaction Using Fe Supported over Activated Carbon. Catalysts 2021; 11: 1456. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11121456 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11121456

Anfruns A, Montes-Morán MA, Gonzalez-Olmos R, Martin MJ. H2O2-based oxidation processes for the regeneration of activated carbons saturated with volatile organic compounds of different polarity. Chemosphere 2013; 91: 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.11.068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.11.068

Downloads

Published

2021-12-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
A Pilot Study of a Hybrid Process Involving In Situ Regenerated Activated Carbon, Membrane Separation and Advanced Oxidation for Water Pollution Abatement. J. Chem. Eng. Res. Updates. [Internet]. 2021 Dec. 5 [cited 2026 Feb. 13];8:60-72. Available from: https://avantipublishers.com/index.php/jceru/article/view/1172

Similar Articles

1-10 of 27

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.